Search for: "Matter of Burke" Results 501 - 520 of 1,014
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
3 Sep 2010, 10:35 am by Meg Martin
Burke: The Justices disagreed that the savings statute did not apply to cases brought under the WGCA. [read post]
12 Aug 2022, 3:44 pm by Rebecca Tushnet
Felix Wu: how much do substantive claims matter? [read post]
1 Sep 2016, 4:48 pm by Lawrence B. Ebert
Within the post is the text:Normally, if an inventor believed he or she was left off a patent, he or she could raise the issue in the patent office or federal court and appeal to have it added, explained Dan Burk of the University of California, Irvine, School of Law. [read post]
20 Feb 2014, 9:00 pm by Kirk Jenkins
 Chief Justice Garman asked whether the matter finally came down to good faith. [read post]
3 Jul 2014, 12:03 pm by Kirk Jenkins
 The defendants filed motions to dismiss, alleging that the Circuit Court lacked subject matter jurisdiction over what amounted to a collateral attack on a routine benefits decision of the Board. [read post]
25 Mar 2013, 8:37 am by Brendan Kevenides
  Their statements on the matter were documented verbatim by journalist, John Greenfield, of Streetsblog Chicago, and came in response to questions raised on the subject at the meeting by me and fellow attorney, Jim Freeman. [read post]
8 Sep 2013, 7:29 pm
It is seldom practiced openly, but it is the product of persistent and subtle suggestion imposed upon a weaker mind and furthered by the exploitation of a relationship of trust and confidence as held in Matter of Burke. [read post]
11 Jun 2019, 7:30 am by Sandy Levinson
 The notion of "trusteeship" is often linked with Edmund Burke, himself a participant in the same socio-political order that generated the broader notions of civic republicanism that seem all-too-elusive today as actual criteria for defining a polity. [read post]
4 Dec 2009, 12:29 pm by Brett Alcala
Below is a brief overview of the Provident Asset Management and Medical Capital securities fraud matters. [read post]
18 Oct 2012, 12:21 pm by Kirk Jenkins
Until today, Illinois courts have never specifically defined what sort of “special circumstances” might create a duty to preserve, so the majority considered the matter at some length. [read post]
23 Aug 2012, 12:21 pm by lawmrh
” And besides, why does it even matter that Augusta has supposedly crossed the Rubicon of race and gender? [read post]
15 May 2007, 2:39 am
Burke delivered the decision.Link: [tinyurl.com] . [read post]
14 May 2008, 8:39 pm
Gaither pursued the matter after hearing of other communities in the state enacting sex offender bans.- Especially families and children? [read post]
22 Jul 2007, 10:56 am
The case pended in Superior Court until this spring when an Indiana Supreme Court ruling on a similar matter was rendered. [read post]