Search for: "Matter of G." Results 501 - 520 of 11,462
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
2 Feb 2017, 2:14 am
No more from divsionalsOn 29 November 2016, the Enlarged Board of Appeal at the EPO had issued its order in case G 1/15, but not yet its decision. [read post]
8 Mar 2006, 5:12 am
Then we'd be forced to pick which matters more, FDA approval or deception.Background: because P&G and Astra Zeneca believed that the FDA would not approve Prilosec for OTC use for conditions requiring a doctor's diagnosis, they only sought approval for frequent heartburn. [read post]
30 Nov 2016, 7:36 am
The Enlarged Board of Appeal at the EPO has issued its order in case G 1/15, but not yet its decision. [read post]
2 Aug 2018, 10:43 am by Lawrence B. Ebert
We may assume that the techniquesclaimed are “[g]roundbreaking, innovative, or even brilliant,”but that is not enough for eligibility. [read post]
31 Aug 2014, 1:14 pm by Thomas G. Heintzman
The Court of Appeal’s decision in R & G Draper Farms can be summarized as follows: First: The arbitration was a domestic, not an international commercial, arbitration for the following reasons: both parties had their place of business in Ontario; the carrots were grown, sold by R & G to ATV; processed and resold to R & G in Ontario; the parties had not agreed that the subject-matter of the arbitration related to more than one country; and the… [read post]
3 Jun 2011, 4:03 am by Mandelman
 He REALLY doesn’t want anyone to sell stocks no matter what. [read post]
31 Jan 2008, 2:02 pm
§ § 922(g)(3) and 922(g)(5).HELD:(1) Testimony by government agent that Immigration and Customs Enforcement Agency database contained no record that defendant had lawfully entered United States was properly admissible under public records exception to hearsay rule at Rule 803(10) of the Federal Rules of Evidence. [read post]
7 Nov 2009, 12:12 pm
Some courts allow the filing of so-called amicus curiae ("friend of the court") briefs, i.e. written submissions by persons that are not parties to the case but who offer information on a point of law or some other aspect of the case to assist the court in deciding a matter before it. [read post]
16 Feb 2012, 4:18 am by Gregory Forman
 While the bar needs to investigate and discipline incompetent or dishonest attorneys, I have no idea why the Supreme Court decided to issue a February 15, 2012 public reprimand in In the Matter of William G. [read post]
6 Oct 2020, 11:11 am by Rebecca Tushnet
As a quantitative matter, what was copied was a rounding error. [read post]