Search for: "Matter of Martin B."
Results 501 - 520
of 891
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
23 Sep 2022, 10:17 am
Does it Matter? [read post]
1 Sep 2008, 2:14 pm
This matter has been referred to the Insurance Fraud Bureau. [read post]
9 Nov 2020, 9:01 pm
As Martin Lederman and I argue in an amicus brief, the key to the 2012 ruling was that Congress gave people a choice: (a) obtain insurance or (b) pay extra money in taxes. [read post]
2 Aug 2023, 7:22 am
” “Party A put $1 million in escrow for later payment to Party B if Party B prevailed in court. [read post]
15 May 2008, 9:58 am
" Gary B. [read post]
26 Jun 2018, 8:59 am
Martin, David R. [read post]
2 Jul 2012, 11:57 am
Aston Martin, No. 6:11-cv-00034 (E.D. [read post]
2 Aug 2013, 4:30 am
Seasons hardly matter. [read post]
17 Apr 2014, 4:00 am
(b) Inadvertent Disclosure. [read post]
10 Mar 2008, 1:10 pm
“When considering an equal protection challenge in criminal matters,individuals are ‘similarly situated’ only if they are charged with the samecrime or crimes. [read post]
28 Aug 2024, 7:40 am
When the matter reached the Court of Appeals, defendant argued that the trial court’s instruction was error, and the panel’s majority agreed. [read post]
13 Jan 2008, 4:47 pm
§ 2244(b)(3). [read post]
24 Aug 2022, 9:01 pm
”[20] On February 7, 2022, Acting Chairman Martin J. [read post]
10 Apr 2017, 6:41 am
B.) [read post]
17 Sep 2020, 3:27 pm
§ 108.04(2)(b)] . . . [read post]
7 May 2007, 9:54 am
Martin J. [read post]
28 Apr 2016, 6:50 pm
But a question regarding data analysis by external sources prompted Valencia Martin-Wallace to note that these external sources produced results that didn’t always match the USPTO’s own analyses. [read post]
27 Aug 2023, 3:56 pm
In fact, such conduct is strictly forbidden for federal officials under the Hatch Act and as a matter of Justice Department policy. [read post]
16 Sep 2021, 1:34 pm
In so ordering, Judge Kacsmaryk broke with long-standing precedent cautioning judicial deference to the political branches in matters implicating foreign affairs and seemed to subordinate the Executive’s interest in controlling such matters to States’ interests in immigration enforcement. [read post]
9 Nov 2012, 5:31 am
He merely takes each side's evidence as it is offered, and determines whether there are any facts in dispute that will require a trial to resolve.)In the Fort Worth litigation, Bishops Benitez, Howe, Lambert, Love, MacPherson (again), Martins and Stanton joined three clergy members of the Anglican Communion Institute in submitting an unusual amicus brief to the Texas Supreme Court. [read post]
