Search for: "Medtronic Inc." Results 501 - 520 of 1,086
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
12 Apr 2012, 10:56 am by Bexis
  The Supreme Court emphatically held in Medtronic, Inc. v. [read post]
26 Mar 2012, 6:14 pm by Mark Zamora
A similar analysis was performed for Quattro Secure leads (Medtronic, Inc., Minneapolis, MN)Methods:In February 2012 we searched the FDA’s MAUDE database for deaths associated with Riata, Riata ST, and Quattro Secure leads. [read post]
21 Mar 2012, 5:28 am
The district court explained the disputed documents as follows: "The disputed documents at issue were either authored by Ablation Frontiers, Inc.'s ("AFI") outside counsel for AFI, or Medtronic's outside counsel for Medtronic. [read post]
12 Mar 2012, 10:00 pm by Stephanie Figueroa
Patent No. 7,892,281 entitled PROSTHETIC VALVE FOR TRANSLUMINAL DELIVERY and owned by Medtronic CardioVascular. [read post]
12 Mar 2012, 10:00 pm by Stephanie Figueroa
Patent No. 7,892,281 entitled PROSTHETIC VALVE FOR TRANSLUMINAL DELIVERY and owned by Medtronic CardioVascular. [read post]
13 Feb 2012, 8:30 am by Guest Author for TradeSecretsLaw.com
The Parties and Background Facts Plaintiff Biotronik, Inc. and Defendants Medtronic USA, Inc. and Medtronic, Inc. [read post]
9 Feb 2012, 8:01 am
The allegations in these settlements all case stem from the government's settlement with Medtronic Spine LLC, the corporate successor to Kyphon, Inc., in 2008. [read post]
7 Feb 2012, 2:37 am by Ben Vernia
These settlements follow the government’s 2008 settlement with Medtronic Spine LLC, corporate successor to Kyphon Inc., which paid $75 million to settle allegations that the company defrauded Medicare by counseling hospital providers to perform kyphoplasty procedures as an inpatient procedure even though the minimally-invasive procedure should have been done in many cases on an outpatient basis. [read post]
1 Feb 2012, 10:54 am
The patent infringement lawsuit, filed by Medtronic, Inc., resulted in a $101.2 million jury verdict against NuVasive over its infringement of spinal surgery patents. [read post]