Search for: "Merck and Co"
Results 501 - 520
of 1,266
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
9 Nov 2007, 6:29 am
(photo: Vioxx back in the day . . . . ) We were just talking the other day at the IP ADR Blog about the power of contingent agreements to settle lawsuits in connection with the recent Verizon/Vonage settlement here.Now its the turn of another BIG "V" LAWSUIT -- Merck's Vioxx litigation -- to benefit itself with the largest drug settlement ever but only in the event 85% of all 26,600 litigants agree to drop their cases.Here's… [read post]
9 Nov 2007, 6:29 am
(photo: Vioxx back in the day . . . . ) We were just talking the other day at the IP ADR Blog about the power of contingent agreements to settle lawsuits in connection with the recent Verizon/Vonage settlement here.Now its the turn of another BIG "V" LAWSUIT -- Merck's Vioxx litigation -- to benefit itself with the largest drug settlement ever but only in the event 85% of all 26,600 litigants agree to drop their cases.Here's… [read post]
29 Nov 2011, 1:52 pm
Merck & Co., 878 P.2d 948 (Nev. 1994), there's a majority in favor of the learned intermediary rule. [read post]
21 Aug 2013, 5:12 am
One cannot show nonobviousness by attacking referencesindividually where the rejections are based on combinations of references.In re Merck & Co., 800 F.2d 1091, 1097(Fed. [read post]
27 Dec 2012, 7:42 am
See In re Keller, 642 F.2d 413, 426 (CCPA 1981)(finding that one cannot show nonobviousness by attacking references individually where the rejections are based on combinations of references); see also In re Merck & Co., Inc., 800 F.2d 1091, 1097 (Fed. [read post]
10 Jan 2014, 8:10 am
See In re Merck & Co. [read post]
13 Sep 2007, 10:48 am
Merck & Co., 2007 WL 2493917 (N.J. [read post]
18 Jan 2007, 12:33 pm
Merck & Co., Inc., --- A.2d ----, 2007 WL 91446, *1 (N.J.Super.A.D. [read post]
5 Dec 2014, 6:00 am
Merck & Co., Inc., 2014 WL 6765718 (S.D.Cal.) [read post]
19 Aug 2011, 7:27 am
Merck & Co. [read post]
29 Jun 2014, 3:25 pm
Now that 95% of eligible plaintiffs have opted in, the $100 million defective medical device settlement between NuvaRing manufacturer Merck & Co. and 3,800 claimants will stand. [read post]
16 Jan 2013, 3:41 pm
Women are continuing to file defective medical device/drug injury cases against Merck & Co. [read post]
3 Oct 2019, 11:01 am
Merck & Co, Inc., No. 18-2317, 2019 WL 4309663, 2019 U.S. [read post]
26 Apr 2012, 10:40 am
Merck & Co. [read post]
17 Feb 2012, 11:29 am
In our rather terse (due to firm involvement) post on Monday concerning Merck & Co. v. [read post]
11 Apr 2011, 2:45 am
Court of Appeal (Civil Division) Merck Sharp & Dohme Corp v Teva UK Ltd [2011] EWCA Civ 382 (08 April 2011) High Court (Queen’s Bench Division) Williams v Central Bank of Nigeria [2011] EWHC 876 (QB) (08 April 2011) The Legal Services Commission v F & Ors [2011] EWHC 899 (QB) (08 April 2011) High Court (Chancery Division) Moria & Anor v Bednash [2011] EWHC 839 (Ch) (08 April 2011) Batt v Royal Mail [2011] EWHC 900 (Ch) (08 April 2011) High Court (Administrative Court)… [read post]
16 Oct 2013, 5:55 am
See In re Merck & Co., Inc., 800 F.2d 1091,1097 (Fed. [read post]
27 Dec 2012, 7:24 am
See id. at 426; In re Merck & Co., Inc., 800 F.2d 1091, 1097 (Fed. [read post]
3 Apr 2019, 5:15 am
Merck & Co. 890 F.3d 1231(Fed. [read post]
20 Jun 2013, 9:05 am
In re Merck & Co., 800 F.2d 1091, 1097 (Fed.Cir. 1986); In re Keller, 642 F.2d 413, 425 (CCPA 1981). [read post]
