Search for: "Mrs. Bell" Results 501 - 520 of 1,342
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
3 May 2015, 4:09 pm by INFORRM
Last Week in the Courts On 28 April 2015, there was an application in the case of Bell v. [read post]
26 Apr 2015, 4:36 pm by INFORRM
Next week in the courts On 28 April 2015, there will be an application in the case of Bell v. [read post]
22 Apr 2015, 10:11 pm by Bill Marler
” For Blue Bell, a Drastic Move to Recall Ice Cream as Listeria Findings Rose Bill Marler, a personal injury lawyer and food safety advocate who is now working with Snoqualmie to make changes at its factory, said that the company had since overhauled its production processes, installing new flooring and sanitizing equipment, and adopting third-party sample testing for all batches of ice cream before they are shipped.Outside experts brought in to track down the source of the listeria… [read post]
22 Apr 2015, 2:04 pm
Weidner at the Bell Law Firm in Oregon, who was the lawyer on the brief, to ask for his side of the story. [read post]
16 Apr 2015, 2:38 pm by Lawrence B. Ebert
In the case of the Bell telephone patent there was great room for doubt whether the speaking telephone had been thought of by Mr. [read post]
3 Apr 2015, 1:54 pm by Howard Knopf
TekSavvy may not be Bell or Rogers but it is a very successful commercial entity with about $5- $10 million a month in estimated cash flow. [read post]
30 Mar 2015, 11:11 am
Eleonora and Hugo Cuddigan QC attended a lively discussion chaired by the Hon Mr Justice Arnold. [read post]
23 Mar 2015, 12:42 am by INFORRM
 Mr Justice Mann has heard that the High Court is facing an “unparalleled” task in deciding the damages to be awarded in eight phone-hacking claims. [read post]
3 Mar 2015, 2:53 pm by Giles Peaker
Ben Hoare Bell Solicitors & Ors, R (On the Application Of) v The Lord Chancellor [2015] EWHC 523 (Admin) The legal aid funding regulations for judicial reviews, in effect from April 2014, were the subject of this judicial review. [read post]
2 Mar 2015, 2:43 pm
No muesli mix-up likely in the world where rabbits reignSupreme Petfoods Ltd v Henry Bell & Co (Grantham) Ltd [2015] EWHC 256 (Ch) is another blockbuster judgment from Mr Justice Arnold in the High Court, Chancery Division, England and Wales. [read post]