Search for: "Nathan v. State" Results 501 - 520 of 895
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
10 Dec 2014, 3:55 am by Ben
” The Court’s answer to this was in the negative” and the court added “Get a license or do not sample – we do not see this as stifling creativity in any significant way” although that decision can istelf be contrasted by US District Judge Alison Nathan's more recent decision in the Tuf America v Beastie Boys case in 2013 . [read post]
18 Nov 2014, 12:12 pm by Schachtman
Humble Sand & Gravel, Inc. v. [read post]
27 Oct 2014, 10:46 am by Benjamin Bissell
Over the weekend, the United States and its allies conducted 22 air strikes against ISIS forces inside Iraq. [read post]
24 Oct 2014, 8:48 am
As readers of this blog know, we have been following the case of Marcia Fuller French, et al. v. [read post]
23 Oct 2014, 11:06 am by Benjamin Bissell
Nathan Cirillo, before entering Canada’s Parliament building, where Prime Minister Stephen Harper was meeting with MPs. [read post]
4 Oct 2014, 5:00 pm by John Hochfelder
The defense orthopedic surgeon, Jay Nathan, M.D., disagreed stating that more surgery is not indicated. [read post]
4 Oct 2014, 12:09 pm by Schachtman
That goal ultimately came to have bipartisan support in the United States, largely as a result of Selikoff’s advocacy. [read post]
28 Aug 2014, 4:20 am by Amy Howe
At The Volokh Conspiracy, William Baude discusses Jones v. [read post]
26 Aug 2014, 10:13 am by Mary Jane Wilmoth
Luna; Nathan Montgomery; Adam Daskivich; David Murtha; St. [read post]
21 Aug 2014, 6:16 am by Joy Waltemath
A federal district court in New York conditionally certified a class of (mainly) unpaid workers seeking to collectively pursue their minimum wage claims under the FLSA (Mark v Gawker Media, LLC, August 15, 2014, Nathan, A). [read post]
27 Jul 2014, 9:03 am by Schachtman
Over 20 years ago, in 1993, the United States Supreme Court handed down its Daubert decision. [read post]
12 Jun 2014, 8:33 am by Ben Vernia
” The Court also found persuasive the government’s brief filed in relation to the petition for a writ of certiorari in US ex rel Nathan v Takeda Pharm N Am which had argued that the claim requirement was both “unsupported by Rule 9(b) and undermines the FCA’s effectiveness as a tool to combat fraud against the United States. [read post]