Search for: "National Service Industries v. Powers"
Results 501 - 520
of 1,735
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
3 Aug 2020, 8:33 am
In United States of America v. [read post]
30 Jul 2020, 9:05 pm
Supreme Court’s Department of Homeland Security v. [read post]
28 Jul 2020, 4:22 am
He stressed that the fourth industrial revolution is not about removing human expertise but improving services. [read post]
27 Jul 2020, 7:15 am
Williams, Hassell v. [read post]
22 Jul 2020, 9:05 pm
Forest Service v. [read post]
17 Jul 2020, 3:00 am
Modesto Irrigation Dist. v. [read post]
16 Jul 2020, 6:02 pm
If you’re trying to enforce Terms of Service, you’ll get erratic and unfair outcomes. [read post]
11 Jul 2020, 8:34 am
Vance and Trump v. [read post]
9 Jul 2020, 7:49 am
V. [read post]
6 Jul 2020, 9:44 am
”), aff’d sub nom., Juni v. [read post]
2 Jul 2020, 9:05 pm
Constitution’s separation of powers. [read post]
29 Jun 2020, 11:32 pm
Kagan makes this point later with a snappy signal: The President's engagement, some people say, can disrupt bureaucratic stag- nation, counter industry capture, and make agencies more responsive to public interests. [read post]
26 Jun 2020, 8:07 am
"] From Judge Gary Sharpe's opinion today in Soos v. [read post]
24 Jun 2020, 5:01 am
Acting pursuant to the International Emergency Economic Powers Act, the premier peacetime U.S. sanctions authority, the president has authorized a range of sanctions targeting Iranian industries and leaders. [read post]
23 Jun 2020, 5:50 am
In his study on family taxation, Bittker concluded that the ideal treatment of joint and single filers comes down to one’s assumptions about how the code should acknowledge the role of marriage and the family as a recognizable social, financial, and legal entity.[5] Avoiding the thornier questions of how the Internal Revenue Service (IRS) ought to evaluate marriage as a societal entity and parse income-earning members in a family,[6] if one accepts that married filers are simply… [read post]
23 Jun 2020, 3:00 am
This case presents the following issues: (1) To what extent does the Federal Power Act (16 U.S.C. [read post]
22 Jun 2020, 4:49 pm
The US Supreme Court in National Society of Professional Engineers v. [read post]
17 Jun 2020, 5:38 am
It will a time-consuming and complicated exercise when assessing countries that have a relatively transparent surveillance regime, but it will be even more complex for countries where there is little known about the national security, communications and surveillance practices or where there are no laws that clearly limit state powers. [read post]
17 Jun 2020, 1:12 am
Inghams sought to restrain the referral to arbitration and failed at first instance; see Inghams Enterprises Pty Ltd v Hannigan [2019] NSWSC 1186. [read post]
4 Jun 2020, 4:48 pm
I was looking at histories of civil liberty lawyering across territories that had been part of the British empire, most of my lawyers were engaged in resisting the powers of a variety of Emergency regimes, be it during anti-colonial wars of independence (Kenya, Malaysia, Cyprus); struggles of postcolonial state formation (India, Pakistan, Sri Lanka), or during military occupation (postwar Europe). [read post]
