Search for: "Nerds in Court" Results 501 - 520 of 885
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
30 May 2014, 6:36 am by Jeff Welty
For true Supreme Court nerds, the Court’s website breaks down the four “generations” an opinion goes through on its way to the United States Reports. [read post]
9 May 2014, 7:34 am
Others are legal slang or terms of art used in courts, law firms, law schools, and government offices, including affluenza defense, cryptanalysis, gazump, legaldegook, intrapreneur, mommy track, one-bite rule, psephology, and unperson. [read post]
1 May 2014, 5:26 pm
 Now I admit this may be the sort of technical minutae that only matters to us admin-law-nerd-types (especially those of us that worked on briefs in American Trucking), but if you’re going to assail someone for their errors, I think it’s important to get the story right. [read post]
29 Apr 2014, 6:11 am by Staci Zaretsky
This marks the first time in years that the court has had a full slate of 29 judges, which is also pretty cool for law nerds. [read post]
27 Apr 2014, 11:19 pm
For Fourth Amendment nerds, we certainly live in interesting times. [read post]
16 Apr 2014, 9:48 am by Rick Hills
But, decentralization nerd that I am, I am just as exorcised about the neglect of local governments' powers in New York jurisprudence, and I am hoping that the Court of Appeals mines New York's legal resources for some decent pro-home rule language. [read post]
7 Apr 2014, 8:15 am by Camilla Alexandra Hrdy
This was not widely appreciated in 1978; the Supreme Court, with a few major exceptions (Brenner v. [read post]
3 Apr 2014, 2:49 pm by John Elwood
 Or, if you’re the indoorsy type, it’s the ideal time to spend some time in a dimly lit arena poring over dockets while the delicate scent of ionized air, axle grease, and nerd sweat wafts upon the air. [read post]
27 Mar 2014, 4:02 am by SHG
Under the government’s demand that it be given everything, the government leaves the Court with only two options: deny the warrants — thus depriving the government of needed information — or issue warrants that are repugnant to the Fourth Amendment. [read post]
7 Feb 2014, 10:50 am
  As the removal jurisdiction nerds among us know all too well, the forum defendant rule set forth in 28 U.S.C. [read post]
27 Jan 2014, 5:04 pm by Daniel Schwartz
To those that have raised your hand, you are most likely: a) an employment lawyer; b) a Scrabble nerd; or c) not being honest with yourself. [read post]
26 Jan 2014, 9:01 am
For an excellent summary of the oral arguments see this article in Bloomberg and for the oral transcript for all those copyright nerds out there (the Amerikat included) see this link here. [read post]
15 Jan 2014, 3:47 am
  Thanks, Melanie, for telling us -- and there's a discreet katpat for the sweet soul who told the Kats about this award but wished to remain anonymous.Melanie says she's an art law nerd without the legal degree. [read post]
15 Jan 2014, 12:02 am by Jarod Bona
That may seem like an odd statement, but I am admittedly a bit of a law nerd, particularly when it comes to antitrust and competition issues. [read post]
10 Jan 2014, 7:34 am by Jason Shinn
He is a legal-technology nerd and has been retained as an expert in various legal matters involving computers and misconduct. [read post]
5 Jan 2014, 3:15 pm by Orin Kerr
Still, for the procedure nerds out there, I figured I would offer some thoughts. [read post]
5 Dec 2013, 11:31 am by John Elwood
  And not to be too much of a nerd, but then the government will have to contend with the plain language of 28 U.S.C. [read post]