Search for: "New Jersey Employment Law Letter"
Results 501 - 520
of 677
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
6 Jul 2012, 11:54 am
Cornacchiulo received the letter from the DCR, he filed a lawsuit in a New Jersey state court, claiming Alternative fired him because of his disability in violation of the New Jersey Law Against Discrimination (LAD). [read post]
22 Jun 2012, 12:51 pm
In New Jersey, that belief is contradicted by Gilchinsky v. [read post]
15 Jun 2012, 11:30 am
As discussed here, on June 4, 2012, New Jersey Judge Katharine Hayden sentenced Matthew Kluger (a former associate at several prominent law firms) to twelve years in prison for his role in a insider trading scheme. [read post]
13 Jun 2012, 5:04 am
On June 17, 2009, MONOC sent “letters regarding” this post to the New Jersey Board of Nursing and New Jersey Department of Health, Office of Emergency Medical Services. [read post]
12 Jun 2012, 9:42 am
In a motion for a lighter sentence, Williams’ attorneys paint him as a community leader, a family man, a philanthropist, a caring employer. [read post]
1 Jun 2012, 1:39 pm
A federal district court in New Jersey ruled this week that an employer might have invaded an employee’s common-law privacy rights by coercing a co-worker into giving the employer access to the employee’s Facebook profile. [read post]
31 May 2012, 3:12 pm
The registry lists each offender’s name, birth date, current home address, current employer and work address, and any school being attended or occupational license held. [read post]
27 May 2012, 5:42 pm
The claim arose out of a letter sent by the defendant’s to the plaintiff’s employer alleging he had molested girls. [read post]
25 May 2012, 7:48 pm
New York and New Jersey small business owners may not fall under the jurisdiction of federal statutes if they have few employees, but the guidelines are important for all employers to understand. [read post]
23 May 2012, 8:30 pm
Port Authority of New York & New Jersey, No. 10-CV-7462 (S.D.N.Y. [read post]
17 Apr 2012, 7:22 am
Hillstone Restaurant Group, the District Court of New Jersey applied it to an employer who accessed a forum using an employee’s MySpace login: [read post]
29 Mar 2012, 11:38 am
This ruling is consistent with a recent decision by the Appellate Division of the New Jersey Superior Court which held that tips are not “earnings” subject to garnishment under New Jersey law. [read post]
29 Mar 2012, 11:21 am
This ruling is consistent with a recent decision by the Appellate Division of the New Jersey Superior Court which held that tips are not “earnings” subject to garnishment under New Jersey law. [read post]
29 Mar 2012, 10:38 am
This ruling is consistent with a recent decision by the Appellate Division of the New Jersey Superior Court which held that tips are not “earnings” subject to garnishment under New Jersey law. [read post]
29 Mar 2012, 10:21 am
This ruling is consistent with a recent decision by the Appellate Division of the New Jersey Superior Court which held that tips are not “earnings” subject to garnishment under New Jersey law. [read post]
21 Mar 2012, 8:43 am
See Domestic Relations Law § 236[B], [5-a][b][5]. [read post]
6 Mar 2012, 6:14 pm
By suing to have a court declare the agreement unenforceable, a judge is likely to look more skeptically at the employer, particularly if the pre-litigation letter writing campaign demonstrates the employer has taken an unreasonable position. [read post]
24 Feb 2012, 1:35 pm
Based upon their findings of fact and its application of New Jersey unemployment benefits law, the Appeal Tribunal held that Ms. [read post]
2 Feb 2012, 6:51 am
CALL US TOLL FREE FOR HELP: 1-800-632-1404 We are attorneys that investigate False Claims Act cases nationwide, including in the state of New Jersey for Medicare fraud, tax fraud, contractor fraud and more against a range of employers including healthcare providers, medical device companies, defense contractors, and pharmaceutical companies. [read post]
31 Jan 2012, 5:36 am
In some states, such as Pennsylvania and New Jersey, the vendors, sued in strict liability, often could not point to the Navy’s negligence as a defense because the Navy was immune from a civil suit. [read post]
