Search for: "PATEL v. PATEL"
Results 501 - 520
of 807
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
27 Jul 2009, 10:02 am
It does not appear to address the more fundamental debate taking place on these issues.It is also perhaps worth recalling that the English courts recently strayed into this discussion (perhaps unknowingly) in Patel v Allos [2008]. [read post]
15 Jul 2008, 2:55 am
See the uncited Standard Process v. [read post]
16 Jul 2017, 12:00 am
Lincoln’s Trident: The West Gulf Blockading Squadron during the Civil War; William Davenport Mercer’s Diminishing the Bill of Rights: Barron v. [read post]
1 Nov 2024, 7:40 am
22 articles in this issue The Possibility of a Uniform Legal Language at the Interplay of Legal Discourse, Semiotics and Blockchain Networks Pierangelo Blandino … [read post]
18 May 2022, 12:35 pm
Rohini Kurup and Katherine Pompilio posted the Supreme Court’s ruling in Patel v. [read post]
10 Jan 2020, 7:00 am
Steiner v. [read post]
25 Jan 2010, 2:07 am
The case of Patel v Oldham MBC, heard before the Employment Appeal Tribunal (EAT) decided that when assessing whether the impairment will last for 12 months or more, it is necessary to consider whether another illness is likely to develop or has developed for the purpose of Schedule 1 paragraph 2 of the DDA. [read post]
22 Jan 2008, 7:24 pm
In Biomedical Patent Management v. [read post]
6 Feb 2022, 12:44 pm
The Court of Appeal decision in Patel v London Borough of Hackney (2021) EWCA Civ 897 (our note) was also considered. [read post]
11 Jan 2012, 11:32 pm
Oakes v. [read post]
22 Jun 2015, 12:30 pm
Patel. [read post]
9 Aug 2009, 2:46 pm
United States v. [read post]
29 Jun 2018, 11:53 am
In Patel v. [read post]
21 Apr 2023, 6:00 am
Patel NG, Kesselheim AS, Darrow JJ. [read post]
5 Jun 2008, 6:20 am
Meachum v. [read post]
26 Aug 2012, 5:33 pm
Whatever we think of the patent thicket idea generally, it doesn’t seem to have much bite in Apple v. [read post]
12 Jul 2022, 12:23 pm
(Patel v Hackney LBC (2021) EWCA Civ 897 (our note)) I see no reason to think it was wrong to do so, or that the reviewing officer in this case was wrong to do the same. [read post]
19 Apr 2022, 12:37 pm
See, Knight First Amendment Institute v. [read post]
19 Jun 2022, 4:31 pm
Julian Assange is set to face US extradition after the Home Secretary Priti Patel approved the order under the Extradition Act 2003. [read post]
14 Jun 2020, 7:01 am
In Patel v. [read post]
