Search for: "Parallel Productions, Inc." Results 501 - 520 of 1,001
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
29 Jul 2013, 7:45 am by Schachtman
  These challenges, brought under the securities laws, often are maintained in parallel to product liability actions, sometimes in the same multi-district litigation. [read post]
27 Jul 2013, 2:32 pm by Sai Vinod
Image from hereOn July 5, 2013, the IPAB upheld the decision of the Controller against grant of patent to Monsanto Inc. for a method of producing plants which can withstand harsh environmental conditions. [read post]
17 Jul 2013, 5:35 am by Bexis
Jude Medical, Inc., No. 0:12-cv-01717-PJS-JSM, slip op. [read post]
10 Jul 2013, 2:47 pm by Rick St. Hilaire
There are those at one edge of the cultural property spectrum who view import restrictions on archaeological material from the perspective of trade regulations that govern consumer products in the marketplace. [read post]
10 Jul 2013, 1:32 pm by Venkat
[Post by Venkat Balasubramani with a comment by Eric; followed by a massive supplement from Eric] [Eric's intro: sometimes, a draft blog post misses the publication window and then comes out painfully late. [read post]
5 Jul 2013, 5:00 am by Bexis
Astra Pharmaceutical Products, Inc., 993 F.2d 528, 538 (6th Cir. 1993). [read post]
2 Jul 2013, 12:09 pm by Tom Lamb
That alleged off-label promotion, they argue, constitutes a parallel claim, which means that their lawsuits are not barred by federal law.... [read post]
24 Jun 2013, 12:50 pm by Bexis
  Bartlett applies across the board to all FDA-regulated products, and we’d say to all federally-regulated products (that’s the implication of the discussion (id. at 18-19) of Bates v. [read post]
19 Jun 2013, 4:30 am by Steve McConnell
SEI Pharmaceuticals, Inc., 2013 WL 2444646 (S.D. [read post]
6 Jun 2013, 1:00 am by Submitted Post
A PAE’s business model is driven by purchasing and defending patent rights, rather than developing a product. [read post]
6 Jun 2013, 1:00 am by Submitted Post
A PAE’s business model is driven by purchasing and defending patent rights, rather than developing a product. [read post]
31 May 2013, 4:59 am by Florian Mueller
After Microsoft felt forced for procedural reasons to add Google Inc. to a German patent infringement action originally brought only against its Motorola Mobility subsidiary, a Microsoft v. [read post]
2 May 2013, 4:10 am by Howard Friedman
Mariotti Building Products, Inc., (3d Cir., April 29, 2013), the U.S. 3rd Circuit Court of Appeals dismissed a Title VII religious discrimination claim brought by an officer-director-shareholder of a family owned corporation. [read post]