Search for: "People v. Hughes"
Results 501 - 520
of 766
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
13 Feb 2013, 9:14 pm
Bowman v. [read post]
11 Feb 2013, 3:04 pm
From our much-admired former guest Kat and respected blogger Norman Siebrasse comes news that the IPKat has been judicially cited by Hughes J of the Federal Court of Canada in Pfizer Canada Inc v Pharmascience Inc 2013 FC 120 at paragraph 75, for the Kat's explanation of the "Angora cat" approach to claim construction (the cited url is not exactly right -- it says "com-uk" rather than "co.uk"). [read post]
10 Feb 2013, 4:05 pm
It “would allow people to collect damages from someone who photographs them in an offensive way during their personal or family time“, reports AP (at Politico). [read post]
5 Feb 2013, 6:19 am
In Shah v. [read post]
29 Jan 2013, 9:01 pm
Blueford v. [read post]
8 Jan 2013, 9:01 pm
In October of this past year, in Planned Parenthood v. [read post]
17 Dec 2012, 2:30 am
On 12 December 2012, the Court of Appeal (Arden and Lloyd-Jones LJJ and Tugendhat J) handed down judgment in Cammish v Hughes ([2012] EWCA Civ 1655). [read post]
2 Dec 2012, 11:11 pm
Also of interest here is this post by Hugh Tomlinson QC, who disagrees with Chakrabarti and points out that she has been misrepresented (she did not, in fact, say that the Leveson proposals, if enacted, would be illegal or incompatible with the HRA). [read post]
24 Nov 2012, 12:38 pm
The caveat makes sense, but it clearly was never intended to be some sort of bright-line rule for people too lazy to look at the actual studies and data. [read post]
21 Nov 2012, 4:00 am
In Copyright and Incomplete Historiographies: Of Piracy, Propertization, and Thomas Jefferson, Justin Hughes traces the ”robust history of copyright being referred to as ‘property. [read post]
20 Nov 2012, 10:04 am
In today's ruling the court (Lords Justices Lewison -- who is a former Patents Court judge -- Etherton and Hughes) allowed M&S's appeal. [read post]
16 Nov 2012, 2:23 pm
What about the now-late Brett Hartman, or the even more recently late Preston Hughes? [read post]
28 Oct 2012, 11:56 am
That was basically the issue in Euro-Excellence v. [read post]
23 Oct 2012, 8:08 am
Doyal, Chief Justice Hughes spoke as follows respecting the copyright monopoly granted by Congress, ‘The sole interest of the United States and the primary object in conferring the monopoly lie in the general benefits derived by the public from the labors of authors. [read post]
23 Oct 2012, 8:08 am
In the 1932 Supreme Court case Fox Film Corp. v. [read post]
16 Oct 2012, 4:00 am
On Friday a Hinds County jury rendered a $100,000 verdict Friday in Marble v. [read post]
29 Aug 2012, 2:31 am
Preamble Since the announcements of the iPhone and Microsoft's Surface (both in 2007), an especially large number of people have asked me about multi-touch. [read post]
28 Aug 2012, 5:27 pm
[Week commencing 13 August] Full Fact v Evening Standard, Clause 1, 17/08/2012; Joseph Horner v The Observer, Clause 1, 16/08/2012; Mr Christopher Mackin v Daily Mail, Clause 1, 15/08/2012; Jane Hughes v The Independent on Sunday, Clause 1, 15/08/2012; Dr Yannis Alexandrides v Daily Mail, Clause 1, 15/08/2012; Mr Oliver Gray v Daily Mail, Clause 1, 15/08/2012; Alex Jarvis v Daily Mail, Clauses 3, 5, 15/08/2012; Inspired Thinking… [read post]
27 Aug 2012, 3:58 pm
Even readers of the red-top press and children's comics will probably be well apprised of this case by now, although they might be forgiven for getting this case confused with the seeming millions of other Apple v Samsung, Apple v The World, The World v Apple-type disputes that have been plaguing courts across the globe. [read post]
