Search for: "People v. LAS" Results 501 - 520 of 2,370
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
14 Jun 2020, 4:27 pm by INFORRM
On 12 June 2020 Elisabeth Laing J handed down judgment in the case of Warnes v Forge [2020] EWHC 1496 (QB) (heard 20 May 2020). [read post]
11 Jun 2020, 11:30 pm by Schachtman
Once again, a meta-analysis is advanced as a basis for an expert witness’s causation opinion, and once again, the opinion is the subject of a Rule 702 challenge. [read post]
7 Jun 2020, 4:34 pm by INFORRM
Canada In the case of The College of Pharmacists of Manitoba v Jorgenson 2019 MBQB 87 Rempel J ordered a Winnipeg pharmacists to pay $150,000 in damages to his regulatory body which he accused of covering up the deaths of 24 indigenous people. [read post]
5 Jun 2020, 3:00 am by Jim Sedor
Campaign Funds for Judges Warp Criminal Justice, Study Finds New York Times – Adam Liptak | Published: 6/1/2020 In Gideon v. [read post]
26 May 2020, 3:06 pm by Patricia Hughes
There are exemptions to these provisions for people in specified categories as long as they have no symptoms. [read post]
26 May 2020, 6:22 am by Schachtman
In one such alternative universe, people would ask to examine the evidence for and against claims, and they would have a healthy respect for uncertainty. [read post]
26 May 2020, 2:55 am by Kevin Kaufman
This analysis was prepared by a select group of JD candidates at the Institute of International Economic Law (IIEL) at Georgetown University in conjunction with TradeLab. [read post]
24 May 2020, 4:06 pm by INFORRM
On the same day Elisabeth Laing J heard a preliminary issue trial in the case of Warnes v Forge. [read post]
17 May 2020, 4:39 pm by INFORRM
On 10 May 2020 the Prime Minister announced a plan for a gradual ease of the lock down and a new phase which will see more businesses reopening and people gradually returning to work. [read post]