Search for: "People v. Olds" Results 501 - 520 of 11,280
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
6 Jun 2023, 5:06 am by Bob Ambrogi
To help her do that, she has already made two key hires for the Legal Innovation Lab, naming Sam Moore as director of innovation and Karol V. [read post]
5 Jun 2023, 4:21 pm
Plaintiffs (the people who want the old name) are represented by the Harmeet Dhillon Law Group.One of those firms is much smarter -- and writes much, much better briefs -- than the other.That said, here, the worse law firm is in the right -- and wins -- and the better law firm is in the wrong and loses.Reasonable minds might perhaps differ on whether it's permissible for the law school to change its name given the underlying circumstances and contractual provisions regarding… [read post]
4 Jun 2023, 5:58 pm by Bill Marler
In addition, FoodNet conducts active laboratory- and population-based surveillance. [7] In 2006, public health officials from 48 states reported 1,270 foodborne disease outbreaks, with a confirmed or suspect source in 884 of the outbreaks (70%). [8] Only one of the outbreaks with a confirmed source was attributed to Listeria, with this outbreak involving eleven hospitalizations and one death. [8] The next year, of 17,883 lab-confirmed infections, the CDC attributed 122 to Listeria. [9] In 2009,… [read post]
4 Jun 2023, 2:40 am by SHG
Justifying his decision to file the motion, Fleischman cited the 1972 case Barker v. [read post]
2 Jun 2023, 9:11 am by Barry Barnett
” https://www.linkedin.com/posts/barry-barnett-8313014_findings-and-conclusions-in-us-v-american-activity-7066821377835626497-6QFM? [read post]
31 May 2023, 12:38 pm by Michael C. Dorf
We wrote a brief together in Elane Photography v. [read post]
26 May 2023, 4:11 pm by Bill Berenson
The second-highest number of deaths, in California with 10 million more people, was 437. [read post]
24 May 2023, 11:02 am by John Elwood
Underwood, the Supreme Court invalidated a similar provision of the Alabama constitution that disenfranchised people convicted of crimes “involving moral turpitude. [read post]
23 May 2023, 1:10 pm by Steve Gottlieb
Before the Constitution and before the First Amendment, the old British rule applied here. [read post]
23 May 2023, 9:43 am
Especially since we're talking about a painting that's 100+ years old, its original (as well as alleged successor) owners have long since met their reward (their descendants are the ones filing suit), and the painting's being displayed to the public in the interim. [read post]
23 May 2023, 7:50 am by Evan George
In 1999, the Montana Supreme Court issued a decision in a case called Montana Environmental Information Center v. [read post]
22 May 2023, 2:53 pm
The defendant in this case remains massively uninterested in the dispute; it's an old run-down nightclub in Lake Forest that's been out of business for almost a decade, so no one cares about (or is going to pay) any judgment in any event. [read post]