Search for: "Powers v. Taylor" Results 501 - 520 of 874
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
19 Jun 2014, 4:00 am by Administrator
Supreme Court held more than a decade ago in Swidler & Berlin v. [read post]
7 May 2014, 4:00 am by The Public Employment Law Press
The Appellate Division noted that the judiciary “had no power to negotiate with the State with respect to the decrease in compensation,” and they “received no benefit from the no-layoffs promise because their terms of office were either statutorily or constitutionally mandated. [read post]
1 May 2014, 8:36 am
Incontinence hereIncompetence hereIntemperance herePee Power hereHuge thanks are due to Paul England (Taylor Wessing LLP) for leaping into instant action in order to draft this word-perfect Katnote in less time than it takes to, well never mind ... [read post]
29 Apr 2014, 10:55 am by Margaret Wood
Supreme Court decision Taylor v. [read post]
18 Apr 2014, 1:34 am by J
After all, we know from the decided cases that the powers under s.24 are broad and are designed to ensure that a coherent scheme of management exists (Maunder-Taylor v Blaquiere [2002] EWCA Civ 1633; Cawsand Fort Management Co Ltd v Stafford [2007] EWCA Civ 1187) and, if that requires a penal notice, why not? [read post]
18 Apr 2014, 1:34 am by J
After all, we know from the decided cases that the powers under s.24 are broad and are designed to ensure that a coherent scheme of management exists (Maunder-Taylor v Blaquiere [2002] EWCA Civ 1633; Cawsand Fort Management Co Ltd v Stafford [2007] EWCA Civ 1187) and, if that requires a penal notice, why not? [read post]
14 Apr 2014, 5:19 am by Alfred Brophy
  This post talks about a list of about 120 books on the "black experience" that Judge Don Young ordered to be placed into the Marion, Ohio prison library back in 1972,  Taylor v. [read post]
20 Mar 2014, 5:19 am by Mark Graber
  Alvis, Bailey and Taylor note some minor legal differences between the defenses of congressional delegation theory advanced by Justice Louis Brandeis and James McReynolds in Myers v. [read post]
3 Feb 2014, 1:18 am by Laura Sandwell
On Wednesday 5 February 2014 the Supreme Court will hand down judgment in the following: Adamson & Ors v Paddico Ltd; Taylor (on behalf of the Society for the Protection of Markham and Little Francis) v Betterment Properties Ltd; and Richardson & Anor v Director of Public Prosecutions. [read post]
3 Jan 2014, 1:39 pm
Supreme Court `has long recognized that when a State brings its judicial power to bear on an indigent defendant in a criminal proceeding, it must take steps to assure that the defendant has a fair opportunity to present his defense. [read post]
28 Dec 2013, 1:18 pm by Giles Peaker
An attempt by Ms F to argue that the rule in Rylands v Fletcher (1866) L.R. 1 Exch. 265 applied giving rise to a strict liability on CHA was quickly dealt withThe use in question must therefore be extraordinary and unusual in contrast to, [read post]
28 Dec 2013, 1:18 pm by Giles Peaker
An attempt by Ms F to argue that the rule in Rylands v Fletcher (1866) L.R. 1 Exch. 265 applied giving rise to a strict liability on CHA was quickly dealt withThe use in question must therefore be extraordinary and unusual in contrast to, [read post]