Search for: "Procter "
Results 501 - 520
of 1,560
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
29 Apr 2014, 3:53 am
In this 2-minute video, I describe the criteria – in practical terms – of being appointed a SEC Commissioner: Webcast: “Latest Developments in IPOs & Capital Raising” Tune in tomorrow for the webcast – “Latest Developments in IPOs & Capital Raising” – to hear Jocelyn Arel of Goodwin Procter; Steve Bochner of Wilson Sonsini; Dave Lynn of TheCorporateCounsel.net and Morrison & Foerster; and David Strong, Partner of Morrison &… [read post]
18 Apr 2014, 8:42 pm
Yost of Goodwin Procter will provide patent counsel with an analysis of the evolving standard for patent infringement claims and the use of opinions of counsel, and discuss the issue of waiver of the attorney-client privilege and provide best practices for leveraging opinions of counsel. [read post]
4 Apr 2014, 4:24 am
This is a good outcome for Procter & Gamble. [read post]
25 Mar 2014, 4:43 pm
Procter & Gamble, Tesco, Disney, GE—these are just a few of the global 2,000 that are now in a race to become digital. [read post]
21 Mar 2014, 7:43 am
Estrella Torrez prepares for her workshop, Establishing an Urban Indigenous Curriculum Ogemakwewaag Sharon Kota and June Mamagona Fletcher Emily Procter and Brandon Stevens [read post]
14 Mar 2014, 6:00 pm
Crane (Stoel Rives, LLP), Stephen Putnoki-Higgins (Withers Bergman, LLP) recently published an article entitled, Gift Planning with Formula Clauses: From Procter’s Progeny to Wandry World (Part 2), 28 Prob. [read post]
6 Mar 2014, 2:11 pm
Other companies which did the same included Motorola, Procter & Gamble, PepsiCo, and Honeywell International. [read post]
4 Mar 2014, 2:25 am
Not only that, but they were not present in the Kiddee Case (you can see that the tiger has the same colour all over its body).On this point, Kitchin LJ referred to Procter & Gamble Co v Reckitt Benckiser (UK) Ltd [2006] EWHC 3145 (Ch). [read post]
3 Mar 2014, 3:03 am
Procter & Gamble recently decided to make certain varieties of Tide detergent more costly for shoppers. [read post]
2 Mar 2014, 12:43 am
However, for the literally Great Unwashed, the word conjures up a brand of laundry detergent sold with great success by Procter & Gamble. [read post]
25 Feb 2014, 11:42 am
On December 30, Goodwin Procter for ECUSA and local Virginia counsel for the Diocese filed their joint response to the petition. [read post]
20 Feb 2014, 4:00 am
Procter & Gamble Co., 2014 WL 448648 (9th Cir. [read post]
17 Feb 2014, 1:03 pm
The challenge – how to cross examine, impeach or even just diminish the impact of sympathetic witnesses without losing your audience? [read post]
13 Feb 2014, 9:47 am
But what they do disclose are (a) the amount of moneys loaned (not granted outright) to rump dioceses; and (b) the amount of legal out-of-pocket expenses contributed to ECUSA by the Presiding Bishop's Chancellor's law firm, Goodwin Procter. [read post]
11 Feb 2014, 6:14 am
The Second Circuit just nixed the company’s bid to ditch Michael Bromwich of Goodwin Procter. [read post]
23 Jan 2014, 11:06 am
How good were Goodwin's bonuses for 2013? [read post]
20 Jan 2014, 12:00 pm
Crane (Stoel Rives, LLP), & Stephen Putnoki-Higgins (Withers Bergman, LLP) recently published an article entitled, Gift Planning with Formula Clauses: From Procter’s Progeny to Wandry World (Part 1), Probate & Property Vol.... [read post]
31 Dec 2013, 7:38 am
Thus, it is reported that no less than Procter & Gamble (“P&G”) obtained a patent back in 1995 for an extraction based on monk fruit as a sugar substitute, but P&G did not seem to develop the product commercially. [read post]
26 Dec 2013, 1:27 pm
Alessi, Esquire, Adam Slutsky, Esquire, GOODWIN PROCTER LLP, Boston, Massachusetts, Attorneys for Plaintiffs Great Hill Equity Partners IV, LP, Great Hill Investors LLC, Fremont Holdco, Inc., and BlueSnap, Inc. [read post]
9 Dec 2013, 6:34 am
In Ex parte Gibbons , Procter & Gamble lost on an In re Best issue:See In re Best, 562 F.2d 1252, 1255 (CCPA 1977) (“[T]he PTO can require an applicant to prove that the prior art products do not necessarily or inherently possess the characteristics of his claimed product. . . . [read post]
