Search for: "Progressive v. Stand-Up" Results 501 - 520 of 1,420
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
14 Nov 2016, 5:20 am by Marcus Dodds
REGULUS SHIP SERVICES PTE LTD v (1) LUNDIN SERVICES BV (2) IKDAM PRODUCTION SA [2016] EWHC 2674 (Comm) In this case, the meaning of the term “in light ballast condition” came up for consideration by the Court for a second time. [read post]
31 May 2020, 9:01 pm by Neil Cahn
All can be heard in New York County Supreme Court Justice Matthew Cooper’s May 18, 2020 decision in Chu v. [read post]
27 Jun 2024, 6:30 am by Guest Blogger
Punish Treason is a logical progression for Graber from his work on Dred Scott. [read post]
11 Sep 2020, 7:30 am by Michelle Onibokun, Chuck Rosenberg
As the election approached, Bharara faced a dilemma: The entire state assembly was up for reelection in November 2012. [read post]
4 Jan 2022, 4:10 am by SHG
But standing up for him doesn’t require agreement. [read post]
9 Oct 2014, 9:12 am
  Sometimes, particularly in real (not made up “parallel claims”) manufacturing defect cases, there simply isn’t a good defense on the merits. [read post]
16 Jun 2020, 6:30 am by Guest Blogger
It opens the putative bigot up to conversation and persuasion. [read post]
29 Nov 2009, 2:51 am by Bystander
Even in the last year we have been faced with a defence lawyer standing on his dignity and refusing to give details of his line of defence as required by the CPR. [read post]
14 May 2010, 2:36 pm by Green Building Law Brief
Benefit Corporations are for-profit enterprises, but they also identify in their corporate documents social progress objectives. [read post]
23 Nov 2014, 4:06 pm by INFORRM
Meanwhile, there are three “Operation Elveden” criminal trials is in progress. [read post]
10 Oct 2019, 4:01 am by Administrator
I will never forget Martha’s courage in standing up to a withering line of questions from the Court of Appeal for Ontario. [read post]
26 Apr 2010, 1:30 pm by Tom Goldstein
  Certainly, to the extent that the President’s goal is to select a nominee who will articulate a broad progressive vision for the law, Judge Garland would be a very unlikely candidate to take up that role. [read post]