Search for: "ROBERT ROE" Results 501 - 520 of 1,253
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
15 Nov 2021, 8:05 am
Many conservatives [worry about John Roberts because of] the Obamacare decision... [read post]
12 Nov 2021, 6:47 am by James Romoser
Here’s the Friday morning read: Democrats, leave the Supreme Court alone (Mitch McConnell, The Washington Post) How Trump Transformed the Supreme Court (Isaac Chotiner, The New Yorker) CVS withdraws Supreme Court case on disability rights, announces new partnership (Michael Roppolo, CBS News) The Marble Palace Blog: Midnight at SCOTUS (Tony Mauro, The National Law Journal) Roe Undermines the Supreme Court’s Legitimacy (Matthew Franck & Robert George, National… [read post]
2 Nov 2021, 5:15 am by Stephen E. Sachs
Letting private parties sue judges and court clerks over an unconstitutional law, for example, would be what Chief Justice Roberts described in his VOPA v. [read post]
1 Nov 2021, 8:40 pm by Ilya Somin
As I have previously emphasized, this case is not about the future of Roe v. [read post]
1 Nov 2021, 1:40 pm by Amy Howe
That is a clear conflict with the Supreme Court’s landmark decisions in Roe v. [read post]
1 Nov 2021, 10:35 am
These Lawyers Want to Know Which Judges Are Handling It InsteadThe Jane Roe lawsuit is currently before the U.S. [read post]
29 Oct 2021, 11:06 am by Amy Howe
Four justices dissented from the decision, including Chief Justice John Roberts. [read post]
27 Oct 2021, 6:21 am by Michael C. Dorf
For example, I read Chief Justice Roberts in the June Medical case last year to be saying that, if push came to shove, he might vote to overrule Roe, Planned Parenthood v. [read post]
25 Oct 2021, 9:39 am by Mary Ziegler
In dissent, Chief Justice John Roberts described S.B. 8 as “unprecedented. [read post]
18 Oct 2021, 1:04 pm by Amy Howe
District Judge Robert Pitman granted the administration’s request to put the law on hold. [read post]
18 Oct 2021, 4:30 am by Eric Segall
Changing judge changes law.Between 1973 and 1992, pursuant to Roe v. [read post]
11 Oct 2021, 9:01 pm by Joanna L. Grossman
It was legal for 48 years straight—from the Supreme Court’s decision in Roe v. [read post]
10 Oct 2021, 9:01 pm by Austin Sarat and Dennis Aftergut
” That characterization ignored the ruling’s profound real-world effect, preventing 85%-90% of women from exercising their rights under Roe v. [read post]