Search for: "Robertson v. Robertson" Results 501 - 520 of 936
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
4 Nov 2014, 6:40 am by Schachtman
Christopher Tarver Robertson, “Blind Expertise,” 85 N.Y. [read post]
18 Oct 2012, 3:22 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
Absent an express agreement, an attorney is not a guarantor of a particular result (see Byrnes v Palmer, 18 App Div at 4; see also 1B NY PJI3d 2:152, at 140-141 [2012]), and may not be held "liable in negligence for . . . the exercise of appropriate judgment that leads to an unsuccessful result" (Rubinberg v Walker, 252 AD2d 466, 467; see Grago v Robertson, 49 AD2d 645, 646; see also PJI 2:152). [read post]
25 Apr 2024, 9:30 pm by The Regulatory Review
The regulation is part of an effort to preserve the reproductive rights of women in the aftermath of the overturning of Roe v. [read post]
28 Mar 2010, 8:33 pm by Anna Christensen
Reed, and reply briefs for petitioners are now available on the case pages for Robertson v. [read post]
21 Jun 2016, 6:52 am by Amy Howe
United States), and from Cassandra Robertson and Howard Wasserman in two posts at PrawfsBlawg. [read post]
30 Nov 2007, 2:31 am
Folsom, IIIWhether district court modification after probation revocation was illegalJanuary 28-Monday-p.m.Joshua Robertson v. [read post]
2 Nov 2010, 1:18 am by INFORRM
A declaration of falsity was made in the case of Salman Rushdie v Evans and others in 2008. [read post]
1 Feb 2007, 10:10 pm
Robertson states that Fritz is incapable of managing his affairs and himself. [read post]
27 Feb 2007, 9:52 am
Robertson also rejected a constitutional challenge to the Act's court-stripping provision. [read post]
30 Apr 2010, 3:34 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
An attorney may be liable for ignorance of the rules of practice, for failure to comply with conditions precedent to suit, for neglect to prosecute or defend an action, or for failure to conduct adequate legal research (see McCoy v Tepper, 261 AD2d 592; [*2]Gardner v Jacon, 148 AD2d 794, 796; Grago v Robertson, 49 AD2d 645, 646). [read post]
4 Nov 2011, 5:15 pm by INFORRM
A necessary ingredient of a claim in malicious falsehood is that special damage must follow as a direct and natural result of the publication (see Kaye v Robertson [1991] FSR 62, at 67). [read post]
13 Jan 2011, 4:16 am by INFORRM
On Tuesday the Fourth Section of the European Court of Human Rights heard the application in the case of Mosley v United Kingdom. [read post]