Search for: "S. v. Social Security Administration"
Results 501 - 520
of 3,402
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
2 Sep 2017, 9:57 pm
Social Security Administration (SSA), along with the Supplemental Security Income (SSI) benefits program, and the Old Age and Retirement benefits system, which is the program most people think of when they are thinking of Social Security benefits. [read post]
1 Feb 2016, 7:41 am
Recent practices at the Department of Industrial Accidents and the Social Security Administration require an explanation of how the attorney arrived at their Sciarotta rate. [read post]
12 Jun 2018, 3:00 pm
Berryhill 17-1606 Issue: Whether the decision of the Appeals Council—the administrative body that hears a claimant’s appeal of an adverse decision of an administrative law judge regarding a disability benefit claim—to reject a disability claim on the ground that the claimant’s appeal was untimely is a “final decision” subject to judicial review under Section 405(g) of the Social Security Act, 42 U.S.C. [read post]
16 Nov 2017, 4:09 pm
A partial explanation for the AG’s new call can be found in R v F ex parte BBC, which concerned the public reaction, expressed through social media, to the murder of Angela Wrightson, and its impact on the trial of those accused. [read post]
23 Jul 2011, 1:20 pm
Public Law 104-121, section 107(a), prohibits redemption of Social Security trust fund securities prior to maturity for any purpose other than the payment of benefits or administrative expenses.So it's still true that the debt limit cannot block social security payments, at least until the trust fund runs out. [read post]
9 Jul 2018, 3:28 pm
Hayden is a former head of the CIA and NSA, and a harsh critic of the Trump Administration. [read post]
20 Oct 2020, 1:16 pm
Barrett dissented, concluding that the Department of Homeland Security’s interpretation was reasonable. [read post]
8 May 2017, 5:00 am
The Appellate Division held that the Board's administrative order "violated the New York Constitution, the Judiciary Law, and the Retirement and Social Security Law. [read post]
8 Feb 2009, 1:44 pm
Not only did the Court deny Ex-Husband’s request to terminate alimony but the Court also wrote a letter to the IRS, State Division of Taxation, the Sussex County Prosecutor and the Social Security Administration. [read post]
14 Dec 2017, 8:45 am
Social Security Administration In Justiniano v. [read post]
14 Jan 2011, 8:45 am
Many tax advisors have recommended that their clients use the S election to reduce their social security and medicare tax liability. [read post]
3 May 2023, 2:20 am
However, the Countering Terrorism and Enhancing Public Security Act (Federal Law no. [read post]
31 Aug 2023, 6:05 am
Brown v. [read post]
1 Dec 2016, 6:38 am
Such capabilities will inevitably have weaker safeguards, weaker security guarantees, make data access more physically dangerous, and have more illiberal social corrective consequences. [read post]
3 Jul 2021, 2:33 pm
Schoenberg v. [read post]
9 Aug 2016, 4:42 am
Susan Till v. [read post]
9 Aug 2016, 4:42 am
Susan Till v. [read post]
20 Jul 2015, 6:19 am
On appeal, the defendant claims that the trial court erred in failing to reduce the amount of the arrearage by the amount of dependency benefits paid directly to the plaintiff, as custodian of and representative payee for the child, by the Social Security Administration, as additional support for the child in light of the awarding of Social Security disability benefits to the defendant. [read post]
28 Jun 2010, 4:33 am
Two-part test applied in resolving union’s improper practice chargeMatter of Social Service Employees Union, Local 371, (Aubrey Norris) v New York City Bd. of Collective Bargaining, 47 AD3d 417The Appellate Division upheld a determination by the New York City Board of Collective Bargaining that denied Local 371’s claim that the New York City Administration for Children’s Services [ACS] committed an improper practice petition… [read post]
27 Apr 2023, 8:04 am
Must “Be Receiving Social Security Disability Insurance Benefits to Continue to Receive LTD Benefits Beyond 24 Months To qualify for the Plan’s LTD benefits for more than 24 months, Robinson needed to “be receiving” Social Security Disability Insurance (“SSDI”) from the Social Security Administration (“SSA”) by the end of the initial 24 months of LTD payments. [read post]
