Search for: "STATE IN THE INTEREST OF J. S." Results 501 - 520 of 15,808
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
1 Jan 2011, 7:36 am by Kate Bladow
Larry Spain, Starlett Carter, and Naomi J. [read post]
25 Feb 2015, 5:32 am by Rich McHugh
By Rich McHugh The United States Department of Labor (the “DOL”) submitted to the Office of Management and Budget (the “OMB”) a revised version of the “conflict of interest” rule expanding the definition of the term “fiduciary” on Monday, February 23, 2015. [read post]
J&J stated, “[R]esolving this matter as quickly and efficiently as possible is in the best interests of claimants and all stakeholders. [read post]
18 Jun 2019, 3:29 pm by Bernadette Meyler
The common law plays an outsized role in the Supreme Court’s decision yesterday that the Double Jeopardy Clause does not bar successive prosecutions by the states and the federal government. [read post]
6 Jul 2020, 4:05 am by Howard Friedman
Montana and Ordering the State to Fund Religious Schools: What's Left of the Establishment Clause? [read post]
22 Dec 2017, 5:07 pm
United States, 323 U.S. 214, 242 (Murphy, J., dissenting). [read post]
18 Apr 2010, 8:26 pm by John Watts & M. Stan Herring
The national interest rate on credit cards topped out at 14.26% last week, which is the highest it's been since 2001 and also adds $200 in interest payments alone to credit card bills. [read post]
15 May 2018, 11:00 am by Valentin Weber
” Which of these a state does in given circumstance, the book says, will depend on many factors, including the states preexisting relations with nonstate-actor proxies, as well as the states domestic landscape (public-private relations, crime and employment levels, and so forth.). [read post]
20 May 2024, 12:01 pm by centerforartlaw
While in the US there is a lack of posthumous protection in federal and state level (only five states provide it), European nations tend to provide such protection, although the interpretation of these norms at the judicial level may result in their dilution over time, as moral rights may lose weight or require stricter conditions as time passes after the artist’s death. [read post]
17 Sep 2016, 8:00 pm by Matthew Reisig
Public servants and public officials are ethically obligated to follow their conscience in official acts, and to pursue their roles in what they consider to be the best interest of their communities, the State of New Jersey, and their constituents. [read post]
16 Jan 2012, 4:00 am by Wystan M. Ackerman
Dec. 21, 2011) is an interesting example of how some state supreme courts are effectively ignoring or side-stepping the U.S. [read post]
18 Sep 2011, 2:06 am by 1 Crown Office Row
” Jack of Kent blog 16th September -  “Today’s Met Statement“ Case law which may be of some relevance: X v Morgan Grampian [1991] 1 AC 1 – interpretation of “interests of justice” in the Contempt of Court Act 1981 s.10 Secretary of State for defence v Guardian Newspapers [1984] 2 WLR 268 – “national security” in Contempt of Court Act 1981 s.10 Re an Inquiry under the Company Securities… [read post]
6 Oct 2014, 4:05 am by Howard Friedman
From SSRN:Kara Loewentheil, Satanists, Scott Walker, & Contraception: A Partial Account of Hobby Lobby's Implications for State Law, (Harvard Law & Policy Review, Vol. 9, No. 1, 2015, Forthcoming).Robert J. [read post]