Search for: "Short v. Davis "
Results 501 - 520
of 979
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
28 Apr 2015, 8:59 am
Appeals Court Environmental Decisions <> Allen v. [read post]
9 Apr 2015, 5:00 am
Davis v. [read post]
27 Mar 2015, 9:55 am
Louisiana, 14-6673, and the indefinitely rescheduled Davis v. [read post]
20 Mar 2015, 7:57 pm
Waters, Patricia Laber, Karen Davis-King, Mary M. [read post]
20 Mar 2015, 5:05 pm
See Mohr v. [read post]
13 Mar 2015, 6:40 am
See Mohr v. [read post]
10 Feb 2015, 8:40 am
Davis—sets the stage for far harsher outcomes if the non-citizens in question are former Guantánamo prisoners as opposed to immigrants. [read post]
20 Jan 2015, 3:18 pm
This morning’s BBC’s NewsHour show opened with a news judgment reflecting a genuinely odd moral calculus. [read post]
19 Jan 2015, 10:05 am
One of the more unfortunate outcomes to emerge over the past decade from copyright skeptics is criticism of the Martin Luther King, Jr. estate, and their maintenance of his copyrighted books and speeches—his legal property—that they inherited from him. [read post]
11 Jan 2015, 7:52 pm
The short answer is no. [read post]
2 Jan 2015, 1:29 pm
I believe the proper short form is Davis, so I’ll use that.) [read post]
23 Dec 2014, 1:24 pm
Today's Recorder offers a short interview with 1/2's new Justice Therese Stewart here, the "first openly gay woman to serve as an appellate justice in California. [read post]
18 Dec 2014, 9:01 pm
In Planned Parenthood v. [read post]
12 Dec 2014, 9:58 am
Davis, and Coffy v. [read post]
8 Dec 2014, 3:26 am
Here’s a blog by Davis Polk’s Ning Chiu: The U.S. [read post]
2 Dec 2014, 5:00 am
In 2008, the House of Lords gave judgment in R v Davis [2008] UKHL 36; [2008] 1 AC 1128. [read post]
18 Nov 2014, 8:47 am
With the above context in mind, we now turn to McBride which, for a short time, brought punitive damages back to the high point of Merry Shipping. [read post]
16 Nov 2014, 9:38 am
Sixthly, the decisions of this court in 2011, in Manchester City Council v Pinnock and Hounslow London Borough Council v Powell, extended the powers of the county court when hearing applications by a local authority to recover possession of a property in order to comply with article 8 of ECHR. [read post]
15 Nov 2014, 9:30 am
Davis v. [read post]
12 Nov 2014, 8:01 am
”Jackson v. [read post]
