Search for: "Sotomayor v. Sotomayor"
Results 501 - 520
of 7,838
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
6 Jul 2023, 12:52 pm
In Durbin v. [read post]
6 Jul 2023, 11:00 am
Approximately 25 years later, in Grutter v. [read post]
5 Jul 2023, 2:11 pm
In Lee v. [read post]
5 Jul 2023, 9:30 am
In 1952, the court held in Steele v. [read post]
5 Jul 2023, 7:59 am
The Court's rationale is that the website designer has a free speech right to reject the State of Colorado's compelled speech that she disagrees with.The case is 303 Creative LLC v. [read post]
5 Jul 2023, 4:24 am
The Colorado business owner in 303 Creative v. [read post]
5 Jul 2023, 4:07 am
” Cummings v. [read post]
5 Jul 2023, 3:35 am
There is much to unpack in the Supreme Court’s decision in 303 Creative LLC v. [read post]
4 Jul 2023, 9:02 pm
Justices Ketanji Brown Jackson, Sonia Sotomayor, and Elena Kagan—esp. [read post]
4 Jul 2023, 3:15 pm
" Cummings v. [read post]
3 Jul 2023, 6:09 pm
Perhaps the only important revelation came when Senator Ted Cruz of Texas asked if Jackson would recuse from Students for Fair Admission v. [read post]
3 Jul 2023, 4:52 pm
Contents include:Dossier Verónica Nolazco, Presentación del dossier “Clínicas jurídicas y litigios de interés público en derechos humanos” Cecilia Gebruers, La crítica del derecho en las clínicas jurídicas Diego San Martín Villaverde & Eliana Sotomayor, La relevancia de las clínicas jurídicas de derecho ambiental en Perú Julieta Berger, La enseñanza clínica, un… [read post]
3 Jul 2023, 3:29 pm
Justice Sotomayor repeated this same five-year line in 303 Creative v. [read post]
3 Jul 2023, 2:35 pm
And don't say Moore v. [read post]
3 Jul 2023, 11:14 am
Flores and S. v. [read post]
3 Jul 2023, 11:14 am
In Brown v. [read post]
3 Jul 2023, 11:11 am
Sotomayor dissent at 28. [read post]
3 Jul 2023, 6:19 am
The case is Students for Fair Admissions v. [read post]
3 Jul 2023, 4:00 am
But two things are clear: 1) the Court's explicit approval of Bush v. [read post]
1 Jul 2023, 3:42 pm
” On Friday, Sotomayor outlines many points from her dissent, but the one that seems to stand out is when she alludes to Katzenbach v. [read post]