Search for: "State v. Franklin" Results 501 - 520 of 1,560
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
14 Nov 2024, 9:05 pm by renholding
When I was with you two years ago, I quoted President Franklin Roosevelt when he signed the first of the foundational securities laws in 1933: “This law and its effective administration are steps in a program to restore some old-fashioned standards of rectitude. [read post]
21 Oct 2008, 8:23 am
" (First Franklin Square Assocs., LLC v Franklin Square Prop. [read post]
11 Oct 2006, 5:30 am
Aug. 11, 1995) (courts generally allow broad reading of mistake element, especially where original and added party have close corporate relation); Franklin v. [read post]
21 Dec 2011, 5:42 am
Last week, I blogged about a judge in Franklin County denying a social media discovery motion in Arcq v. [read post]
17 Sep 2019, 4:30 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
” (Herbert H Post & Co. v Sidney Bitterman, Inc., 219 AD2d 214, 224 [1st Dept 1996], quoting Franklin v Winard, 199 AD2d 220, 221 [1st Dept 1993]). [read post]
24 Mar 2016, 9:13 am by Andrew Hamm
At the International Municipal Lawyers Association’s Appellate Practice Blog, Lisa Soronen discusses the State and Local Legal Center’s amicus brief in this Term’s drunk-driving cases, Bernard v. [read post]
6 Jan 2025, 8:24 am by Kalvis Golde
The Supreme Court’s landmark 2022 gun-rights ruling in New York State Rifle and Pistol Association v. [read post]
24 Apr 2025, 8:31 pm by Guest Author
This Act implemented the constitutional division of authority, establishing a nationwide regulatory framework while preserving state appointment of officers. [read post]
11 Oct 2024, 4:32 am by Curtis Bradley
 The post New Book on Historical Gloss and Foreign Affairs, Part V appeared first on Reason.com. [read post]
6 Feb 2012, 4:00 am by Steve McConnell
And in the only case arising from the New Jersey state court consolidated Aredia/Zometa litigation to be tried, Bessemer v. [read post]
13 Jul 2015, 7:22 am by Mark Ashton
 As I read the dissents I kept thinking about the 1954 decision in Brown v. [read post]