Search for: "State v. Hans" Results 501 - 520 of 615
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
21 Feb 2011, 10:52 am by sally
Haribo Lakritzen Hans Riegel Betriebs GmbH v Finanzamt Linz; Osterreichische Salinen AG v Same(Joined Cases C-436/08 and C-437/08); ; [2011] WLR (D) 49 “Legislation of a member state which discriminated against portfolio dividends received by a resident company from a company resident in a non member state party to an EEA Agreement, was contrary to the principle of free movement of capital, where that discrimination was based upon a comprehensive… [read post]
10 Feb 2011, 7:47 am by Scott Wolfe Jr
We wrote a full blog post on one of the more interesting bills introduced to address the controversial Williams v. [read post]
11 Jan 2011, 8:23 pm by Veronika Gaertner
The authors criticise the recent ECJ judgment in Wood Floor Solutions Andreas Domberger GmbH v. [read post]
28 Dec 2010, 5:36 am by Ted Frank
The Governor Tim Pawlenty amicus brief (filed by CEI's Hans Bader and Sam Kazman) in the McCollum litigation does a better job, arguing that South Dakota and Pennhurst State School and Hospital v. [read post]
17 Dec 2010, 6:07 am by Walter Olson
Tags: McDonald's, obesity, on TV and radio, publicity Related posts Welcome Lars Larson listeners (0) Pelman v. [read post]
Hans Hedemann Surf, Inc., No. 27804 (July 13, 2009), a case on nonconforming uses that we detailed in this post. [read post]
14 Aug 2010, 5:49 pm
Hutin YJF, Pool V, Cramer EH, et al [read post]
10 Aug 2010, 8:29 am by Justin Walsh
Blake State Representative Dist. 20, Pos. 1 – Corinne Tobeck State Representative Dist. 20, Pos. 2 – Uncontested State Representative Dist. 21, Pos. 1 – Mary Helen Roberts State Representative Dist. 21, Pos. 2 – Marko Liias State Representative Dist. 22, Pos. 1 – Steve Robinson State Representative Dist. 22, Pos. 2 – Sam Hunt / Chris Reykdal State Representative Dist. 23, Pos. 1 – Sherry… [read post]
8 Aug 2010, 1:04 am
Among those executed was one Herbert Hans Haupt, whom the Court presumed held U.S. citizenship -- a presumption that would become significant in the post-9/11 judgment in Hamdi v. [read post]