Search for: "State v. J. Black" Results 501 - 520 of 1,519
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
26 Jul 2019, 11:18 am
| Beware of your old expert reports, as Henry Carr J allows hearsay expert evidence in Illumina v Ariosa | Still want to be a UPC judge? [read post]
4 Oct 2022, 6:20 pm
"I was sort of shocked, especially with some of the comments that he made because there is a need to understand our culture, and specifically when we pray in our churches, the black culture, we always think of freedom of oppression, freedom of religion, so politics was the furthest thing from my mind," Gundy said. [read post]
17 Nov 2018, 12:10 pm by Schachtman
Indeed, their brief in other places states their opinion that significance testing is not necessary at all: “Testing for significance, however, is often mistaken for a sine qua non of scientific inference. [read post]
3 Aug 2020, 6:56 am by Schachtman
Rev. 786, 792 n.44 (1984) [cited below as Berry], citing Transcript of Motion to Strike State of the Art Defense at 51, Beshada v. [read post]
31 Jul 2012, 7:59 am by Steve Hall
But last Tuesday, Brazos County District Judge J. [read post]
22 Jun 2015, 9:24 am
 * Going Dutch: a national initiative on data breach notification overtakes EU proposalValentina tells us all about recent Dutch Parliament reforms regarding the notification of data breaches.* The Supreme Court in Starbucks (HK); on adjectives and reluctance to embrace changeNeil further reflects on UK Supreme Court’s decision in Starbucks (HK) and another v British Sky Broadcasting Group  [here], focusing on the Court’s use of adjectives and proof of… [read post]
30 Apr 2016, 4:04 am by Andres
The first case is Navitaire v Easyjet, in which Pomfrey J declares that “individual commands […] are a computer language, not a program, and they should not be entitled to copyright. [read post]
1 Jul 2016, 4:14 pm by INFORRM
Seventh Circuit (Illinois – Kanye West’s home state) Jordan v. [read post]
26 Nov 2020, 12:07 am by Josh Blackman
Pritzker, 962 F. 3d 341, 347 (CA7 2020) [Easterbook, J.]; Legacy Church, Inc. v. [read post]
29 May 2024, 3:52 pm by Reference Staff
For scholarly publications, Rule 10.7.1(d) adds a descriptive parenthetical note for citing cases where an enslaved person was involved, and provides examples like “Wall v. [read post]