Search for: "State v. Khan"
Results 501 - 520
of 623
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
16 Dec 2024, 1:44 am
On the same day, there was a hearing in the case of Adams v Johnson. [read post]
3 Jul 2016, 4:09 pm
Aisha Ali-Khan, a former teacher and aspiring lawyer who won libel damages from George Galloway last week after he posted a series of claims in a blogpost in 2012, has pleaded with the legal profession to change its approach to litigants in person. [read post]
17 Jun 2023, 6:25 am
Circuit explained in its 1980 FTC v. [read post]
16 Apr 2021, 4:12 pm
Devgan v. [read post]
23 Jul 2023, 9:01 pm
FTC Chair Lina Khan previewed this in June, stating that “The word ‘efficiency’ doesn’t appear anywhere in the antitrust statutes. [read post]
30 Jan 2023, 11:26 am
On 26 January 2023, Justice Steyn held that a set of YouTube videos, tweets and a change.org petition, by political activists supporting former Pakistani Prime Minister, Imran Khan, contained defamatory allegations against a Pakistani journalist residing in London. [read post]
18 Oct 2017, 9:28 am
As the British pop singer Bat for Lashes (a/k/a Natasha Khan) asks, “What’s a girl to do? [read post]
18 Oct 2017, 9:28 am
As the British pop singer Bat for Lashes (a/k/a Natasha Khan) asks, “What’s a girl to do? [read post]
26 Aug 2022, 8:03 am
The question in this case (Axon Enterprise v. [read post]
10 Oct 2022, 2:48 am
Surveillance Privacy advocates are worried about the use of surveillance technology to track women seeking abortions in US states that have banned and restricted the procedure following the Supreme Court decision which overturned Roe v Wade. [read post]
6 Feb 2012, 2:30 am
Mr Gervase Duffield v The Independent, Clause 1, 01/02/2012; Ms Hayley Quinn v Daily Mail, Clause 1, 01/02/2012; Mr Alex Scott v The Times, Clause 1, 01/02/2012; Mr Alex Scott and Mr James Elliott v The Sun, Clause 1, 01/02/2012; Mrs Jane Clarke v Northwich Guardian, Clause 5, 01/02/2012; Mr Peter Vince-Lindsay v Daily Mail, Clause 1 01/02/2012. [read post]
6 Jul 2018, 4:07 am
” Also at Take Care, Lina Khan criticizes the majority’s “clums[]y” analysis in Ohio v. [read post]
24 Oct 2006, 9:37 pm
Serbia and Montenegro) Case Resources Pulp Mills on the River Uruguay (Argentina v. [read post]
8 Jan 2014, 8:14 am
As Deputy AAG, Harbour argued State Oil v. [read post]
15 Aug 2024, 9:33 pm
FTC Chair, Lina Khan, stated that “fake reviews not only waste people’s time and money, but also pollute the marketplace and divert business away from honest competitors. [read post]
5 Feb 2016, 7:55 am
Batty v. [read post]
3 Feb 2011, 2:11 pm
Some states require a physical impact or physical contact; and others do not recognize the cause of action at all.Blain v. [read post]
7 May 2022, 12:38 pm
” Khan v. [read post]
20 Apr 2023, 12:28 am
Wilkinson is Microsoft's renewed motion to dismiss: DeMartini et al. v. [read post]
26 May 2022, 4:16 am
State Department, the group will be based largely in Poland and bring together multinational experts, including war crimes prosecutors and forensic specialists. [read post]
