Search for: "State v. Square" Results 501 - 520 of 6,573
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
2 May 2023, 2:57 am by Matrix Law
On Thursday 4th May the Court will hear the case of R (on the application of Wang and another) v Secretary of State for the Home Department, on appeal from [2021] EWCA Civ 679. [read post]
30 Apr 2023, 4:00 am by Administrator
As stated above, a non exhaustive definition does not necessarily oust other definitions. [read post]
26 Apr 2023, 3:02 am by Matrix Law
On Thursday 27th April, the Court will hear the case of R (on the application of Worcestershire County Council) v Secretary of State for Health and Social Care, on appeal from [2021] EWCA Civ 1957. [read post]
22 Apr 2023, 11:27 am by Florian Mueller
Defendants from the automotive and telecommunications industries sometimes have approximately ten suppliers (example: Nokia v. [read post]
20 Apr 2023, 1:14 pm by Eugene Volokh
Jonathan Witmer-Rich (Cleveland State) posted this to a discussion list that I'm on, and graciously allowed me to forward it; it's about today's U.S. v. [read post]
18 Apr 2023, 5:48 am by Elizabeth Goitein
The collection of communications between foreign targets and Americans squarely implicates the Fourth Amendment, as the FISA Court has recognized in the Section 702 context. [read post]
18 Apr 2023, 5:16 am by Eric Columbus
He points to the Supreme Court’s 2020 decision in Trump v. [read post]
17 Apr 2023, 5:50 am by INFORRM
The report stated that, on a specific setting, correct matches were made 89% of the time and there was no statistically significant gender or race bias. [read post]
17 Apr 2023, 2:19 am by Matrix Law
On Wednesday 19th and Thursday 20th April the Court will hear the case of Secretary of State for Transport v Curzon Park Ltd and others, on appeal from [2021] EWCA Civ 651. [read post]
14 Apr 2023, 4:41 pm by INFORRM
” Take care with that social media duty of care October 2018: “[Rhodes v OPO] aptly illustrates the caution that has to be exercised in applying physical world concepts of harm, injury and safety to communication and speech, even before considering the further step of imposing a duty of care on a platform to take steps to reduce the risk of their occurrence as between third parties, or the yet further step of appointing a regulator to superintend the platform’s… [read post]
12 Apr 2023, 7:35 am by Cyberleagle
” Take care with that social media duty of care October 2018: “[Rhodes v OPO] aptly illustrates the caution that has to be exercised in applying physical world concepts of harm, injury and safety to communication and speech, even before considering the further step of imposing a duty of care on a platform to take steps to reduce the risk of their occurrence as between third parties, or the yet further step of appointing a regulator to superintend the platform’s… [read post]
11 Apr 2023, 6:24 pm by David Kopel
" In a March 2023 order denying a motion for a preliminary injunction in Delaware State Sportsmen's Ass'n v. [read post]
5 Apr 2023, 5:18 am by Annsley Merelle Ward
Similarly, Hacon HHJ stated in Teva v Novartis [2022] EWHC 2847 (Pat): “It seems that there was little or no interaction between Novartis’ three experts during the preparation of their evidence. [read post]