Search for: "State v. State Board of Equalization" Results 501 - 520 of 4,221
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
28 Feb 2019, 1:00 am by CAFE
Board of Education, 1954 SCOTUS decisions concerning the death penalty: Furman v. [read post]
15 Dec 2014, 4:24 pm by Patricia Salkin
As to the rational basis prong, the court stated that as long as one of the reasons advanced by the zoning board for its decisions is deemed a legitimate rational basis, the plaintiff does not have a viable equal protection claim. [read post]
Equal Employment Opportunity Commission ("EEOC") and in state and federal courts and administrative agencies nationwide number in the hundreds of thousands. [read post]
23 Nov 2009, 12:39 pm
The decision of the court may be oral or in 30 writing and shall state the facts it deems essential. [read post]
29 Aug 2011, 2:16 pm by Robin Wilson
  Thornton resigned and filed a grievance with the State Board of Mediation and Arbitration, where he prevailed. [read post]
5 Mar 2012, 8:13 pm by CHRISTINA NOH
On February 7, in a 2-1 decision, the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit affirmed a District Court’s decision in Perry v. [read post]
12 Dec 2016, 9:29 pm by Patricia Salkin
The City of Binghamton’s Planning Commission and Zoning Board of Appeals (“ZBA”) denied 26 Seminary LLC’s application for a variance. 26 Seminary LLC pointed to this denial as a basis for its non-class-based equal protection claim. [read post]
20 Apr 2011, 11:04 am by Lyle Denniston
   Williams and the local elections board have contended — and probably would contend anew, if they go forward with their planned appeal — that Bush v. [read post]
3 Jul 2018, 8:00 am by Robert Kreisman
Virginia State Board of Elections, 580 U.S. ___, ___; and a State’s consideration of race in making a districting decision is narrowly tailored if the State has “good reasons” for believing that its decision is necessary in order to comply with the VRA, Cooper v. [read post]
3 Jul 2018, 8:00 am by Robert Kreisman
Virginia State Board of Elections, 580 U.S. ___, ___; and a State’s consideration of race in making a districting decision is narrowly tailored if the State has “good reasons” for believing that its decision is necessary in order to comply with the VRA, Cooper v. [read post]