Search for: "State v. Wines" Results 501 - 520 of 1,020
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
21 Jan 2015, 6:39 am
There were sacramental wine exemptions from state-level prohibition statutes, which of course were also echoed in the 1919 federal Prohibition statute. 2. [read post]
5 Jan 2015, 2:58 am by Lindsey A. Zahn
 And, while on its face, this new law sounds like a triumphant victory for a state that previously enacted legislation disfavoring the wine industry (e.g., Granholm v. [read post]
18 Dec 2014, 9:38 am by Andrew Koppelman
Catholics were permitted to use sacramental wine during Prohibition. [read post]
10 Dec 2014, 12:19 pm by Robert C. Lehrman
The case is called Nowrouzi et. al. v. [read post]
10 Dec 2014, 3:10 am
” The motion cites the 2001 California Supreme Court Comedy III Productions, Inc. v. [read post]
1 Dec 2014, 12:15 pm
The amount of the damages or the compensation may be stated in the order or determined in separate proceedings [Rules 125-143]. [read post]
21 Nov 2014, 2:46 am
So influential is this debate that, in his editorial capacity, he sometimes receives articles submitted for publication in JIPLP that state it as being axiomatic that a function of trade mark law (and often the only function of trade mark law) is the protection of the consumer.It's worth taking a look at the law in wider terms. [read post]