Search for: "To v. State Farm Mut. Ins." Results 501 - 520 of 624
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
5 Dec 2011, 2:58 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
[and] that disregard of deadlines should not and will not be tolerated" (Andrea v Arnone, Hedin, Casker, Kennedy & Drake, Architects and Landscape Architects, P.C., 5 NY3d 514, 521 [2005] citing Miceli v State Farm Mut. [read post]
30 Dec 2008, 10:36 am
 The court employed a 1:1 ratio as its starting "guidepost," and analyzed the punitive-damage award using the factors from State Farm Mut. [read post]
4 May 2011, 12:42 pm by Eugene Volokh
To be sure, “[t]he court’s discretion to frame equitable relief is limited by considerations of federalism,” and “[a] State cannot punish a defendant for conduct that may have been lawful where it occurred,” State Farm Mut. [read post]
27 Feb 2012, 3:30 am by Jeremy Tyler
Years later, in 2006, the Florida Supreme Court decided another automobile case, State Farm Mut. [read post]