Search for: "U. S. v. Holder"
Results 501 - 520
of 563
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
9 Mar 2016, 5:15 am
OLG München, 29 U 1204/12), but around the world (e.g. in Croatia, Sweden, etc.). [read post]
9 Mar 2016, 5:15 am
OLG München, 29 U 1204/12), but around the world (e.g. in Croatia, Sweden, etc.). [read post]
17 Apr 2023, 4:01 am
Husband-appointed manager withholds consent to wife’s admission as member, relegating her to holder of an economic interest. [read post]
22 Dec 2008, 12:07 pm
Court Rejects Discriminatory Failure to Hire Claim Based Solely on Applicant's Own AllegationsGaston v. [read post]
19 Jan 2012, 3:49 pm
In another unpublished opinion, Gerber v. [read post]
26 Aug 2013, 11:51 am
The Microsoft v. [read post]
24 Sep 2018, 2:31 am
Not according to Manhattan Commercial Division Justice Saliann Scarpulla whose decision last month in Yu v Guard Hill Estates, LLC, 2018 NY Slip Op 32008(U) [Sup Ct NY County Aug. 15, 2018], dismissed a minority member’s claim for judicial dissolution of two family-owned, realty-holding LLCs under Section 702 of New York’s LLC Law. [read post]
25 Mar 2021, 4:00 am
Implied status (IRPR, s 186(u)). [read post]
2 Feb 2011, 10:22 am
” InterBank used proceeds from new offerings to pay off prior note holders — effectively, a Ponzi scheme. [read post]
9 Apr 2018, 3:49 am
The family-owned business at the center of Vaccari v Vaccari, 2018 NY Slip Op 30546(U) [Sup Ct NY County Mar. 28, 2018], decided last month by veteran Manhattan Commercial Division Justice Eileen Bransten, is a classic example of fraying family bonds in the successive ownership generations caused by divergent career interests and sibling sense of injustice over disparate treatment by their parents. [read post]
4 May 2011, 6:00 am
Holder. [read post]
21 May 2010, 7:45 am
Nelson v. [read post]
28 Mar 2012, 6:45 am
Based on its prior decision in Whittaker v. [read post]
27 Oct 2022, 12:17 pm
In an amicus brief filed in Davidson v. [read post]
29 Nov 2023, 1:08 pm
In my dad’s most well-known case, County of Wayne v. [read post]
24 May 2024, 7:49 am
The panel said that, “[u]sing the tools of history and tradition to which the Supreme Court directed us in [District of Columbia v.] [read post]
9 Apr 2024, 9:01 pm
”[15] The court found that Third Circuit precedents, Hays and Co v. [read post]
30 Oct 2021, 9:25 am
Holder, 556 U. [read post]
1 Feb 2012, 1:22 pm
Another exclusivity provision originally included in FDAAA, but removed and later enacted as part of the QI Act, that is targeted to so-called “old” antibiotics (i.e., FDC Act § 505(v)) is not discussed in the GAO’s report, presumably because of the limited scope of the GAO report. [read post]
28 Jan 2014, 11:18 am
CKS’s findings do show that the figures cited in the President’s report are misleading, but, as we shall see, that evidence exists in other sources as well. [read post]
