Search for: "U.S. v. Strain*" Results 501 - 520 of 886
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
27 Jul 2014, 9:03 am by Schachtman
  With fear and trembling, and sometimes sickness not quite unto death, federal and state judges, and lawyers on both sides of the “v,” must now do more than attack, defend, and evaluate expert witnesses on simplistic surrogates for the truth, such as personal bias or qualifications. [read post]
22 Jul 2014, 7:00 am by Bill Marler
As I have told counsel for Primus, in 20 years of litigating every major foodborne illness outbreak in the U.S., my firm has never sued an auditor. [read post]
21 Jul 2014, 10:01 pm by Bill Marler
The litigation stems from one of the deadliest foodborne illness outbreaks in U.S. history. [read post]
15 Jul 2014, 9:00 am by Benjamin Wittes
But he insisted that extra-territorial application of the U.S. [read post]
7 May 2014, 2:48 pm by Dennis Crouch
An explanation of the significance of new effect in established patent law can be found as long ago as 1822 in Evans v Eaton 20 U.S. 356 (1822) and its evidential nature was explained by Justice Bradley in Webster Loom v Higgins105 US 580 (1881), subsequently approved e.g. by Justice Brown in Carnegie Steel v Cambria Iron Co 185 US 402 (1902): It may be laid down as a general rule, though perhaps not an invariable one, that if a new combination and arrangement of… [read post]
27 Mar 2014, 12:46 pm
He obviously has a perspective of his own on the underlying issues — he was, for instance, a forceful critic of the Court’s Employment Division v. [read post]