Search for: "US v. Henry" Results 501 - 520 of 2,260
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
31 May 2019, 3:54 am by Tinker Ready
Ahmad Rahbar “is a man we need to keep happy” because the previous year “he generated over $11 million in revenues for us,” according to the government’s lawsuit. [read post]
29 May 2019, 12:22 pm
  As summarized by Henry Carr J, "a failure to clear the way is a material factor in cases where irreparable harm to both parties is evenly balanced". [read post]
28 May 2019, 4:48 pm by Sabrina I. Pacifici
We have overruled the Dred Scott and Plessy v. [read post]
20 May 2019, 9:11 am by MOTP
Federal Split There is at least one example that illustrates an inter-jurisdictional incongruity of the latter variety.In Henry v. [read post]
15 May 2019, 12:30 pm
Henry Hyde (R-Ill.) first proposed a law that prevents people enrolled in Medicaid from using their insurance to cover the cost of an abortion if they need one. [read post]
11 May 2019, 5:36 am by Mikhaila Fogel
This week in cybersecurity and technology, Kate Klonick delivered a manifesto on using empirical research and journalism to understand big tech. [read post]
10 May 2019, 6:05 am
In Arcadia v Fenty all judges described the case as borderline, because Rihanna had no property in the image as such, her right was in the goodwill in the business of endorsement, and that goodwill was affected by the use of the image. [read post]
9 May 2019, 2:41 pm by Marco Rossi
Indeed, the attempt to re-characterize a duly incorporated entity as a branch is considered an extreme departure from a fundamental principle of law, which requires that the corporate form be respected, as long as some minimal corporate formalities are met, and is very well settled in the US legal system, where it finds its binding precedent in the decision of the US Supreme Court in the Moline Properties case (Moline Properties, Inc. v. [read post]
15 Apr 2019, 11:44 pm
Henry Carr J concluded that reference to prosecution history in trade mark cases “is the exception, and not the rule”, even more so than in patent cases. [read post]