Search for: "US v. PARIS"
Results 501 - 520
of 1,587
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
9 Jan 2023, 7:59 am
Upreti first discusses the role of national law in such major IP-related ISDS case, Philip Morris v Uruguay, Eli Lilly v Canada, Bridgestone v Panama, and Einarsson v Canada [also commented by The IPKat here and here]. [read post]
10 Nov 2016, 7:31 am
You are a tourist in a foreign country, say Paris, France. [read post]
24 Feb 2010, 7:16 am
It gives effect to article 6bis of the Paris Convention. [read post]
11 Oct 2013, 10:01 am
” United States v. [read post]
29 Jul 2011, 3:46 pm
In Marks v. [read post]
16 Nov 2008, 8:04 pm
See In re Estate of Paris, 699 So.2d 301 (Fla. 2d DCA 1997). [read post]
15 Sep 2009, 4:41 pm
And should a German CTM court be obliged to restrain non-similar use in Germany because the mark are similar to a Spanish speaker? [read post]
22 Nov 2011, 3:48 am
(Contra the absurd claim made by David Segal’s infamous NYT piece denigrating the teaching of such old cases as Hadley v. [read post]
14 Aug 2012, 5:30 pm
In case you as a lawyer have somehow been living under a rock, yes, that big Apple v. [read post]
21 Apr 2011, 11:46 am
Zatarain’s, Inc. v. [read post]
16 Jul 2013, 5:30 am
Court Sufficiently Satisfied that Janssen’s Alzheimer’s Patent is Insufficient http://t.co/BjvLVlQk11 -> Link to Irish Court judgment blocking The Pirate Bay, EMI Records Ireland Ltd & Ors v UPC Communications Ireland http://t.co/Wh9ks2EJpl -> Employee Can't Be Fired When His Login Credentials Are Used on Shared Computer to Access Porn — DOH v. [read post]
20 Aug 2006, 2:03 pm
Another fascinating decision reported in this issue is Adidas-Salomon AG v Draper (Chancery Division, England and Wales), in which adidas won the first round of what will probably be a lengthy struggle against the world's tennis authorities as to whether their rules can limit the use of adidas' three-stripe trade mark on tenniswear used in major tournaments.As usual, the IPKat is delighted to receive suggestions from his readers as to any cases they'd like… [read post]
8 Feb 2023, 1:53 am
In the case of Armasuisse v. [read post]
28 Feb 2024, 7:26 am
Prince and McNatt v. [read post]
6 Sep 2022, 9:05 pm
The financial sector claims to have mobilized over $130 trillion in support of the net zero transition, and 33 percent of the G20’s largest companies by revenue have set a net zero target in alignment with the goals of the Paris Agreement. [read post]
20 May 2013, 2:00 am
Danelz v. [read post]
31 Jul 2014, 4:39 am
Brian Lichtenberg, LLC v. [read post]
17 May 2024, 6:00 am
This is nicely illustrated by three decisions, one from the Helsinki local division in AIM Sport v Supponor (UPC CFI_214/2023), one from the Munich Local Division in 10x Genomics v NanoString (UPC CFI_17/2023) and a recent decision of the Paris Central Division in Nokia v Mala Technologies, (UPC_CFI_484/2023). [read post]
7 Jun 2007, 2:42 am
Brought you up to date … and now I am going to get back to work and listen (as I work) to The Test Match: England v West Indies [read post]
20 Jul 2011, 6:14 am
Generally, parties in India prefer to have their arbitrations in Singapore than in prominent arbitration centres like London, Paris or Switzerland.ADR Prof Blog has a post on the possibility of limiting the applicability of the US Supreme Court's decision in AT & T v Concepcion. [read post]
