Search for: "United States District Court for the District of Montana"
Results 501 - 520
of 745
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
8 Jun 2012, 1:56 pm
Lower Merion School DistrictDocket: 11-1135Issue(s): (1) Whether the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit improperly overturned the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania’s factual finding that race was a factor in Lower Merion School District’s (“LMSD”) student redistricting in light of the fact that LMSD did not appeal the District… [read post]
30 May 2012, 4:13 pm
A federal district court in Montana dismissed a separate lawsuit against a Bureau of Land Management agent in 2011.Attorneys for the United States filed a motion to dismiss Kortlander's tort, criminal, and constitutional law claims. [read post]
29 May 2012, 6:44 am
” Briefly: Lyle reports that “acting quickly and setting the stage for the Supreme Court to act next month, challengers of a Montana law limiting corporations’ spending to influence state elections mailed their reply brief to the Court on Friday. [read post]
26 May 2012, 9:51 am
The United States Supreme Court is currently reviewing a petition for a writ of certiorari in the case of American Tradition Partnership, Inc. v. [read post]
23 May 2012, 2:24 pm
Supreme Court took up the case of United States v. [read post]
23 May 2012, 12:14 pm
Twenty-two states along with the District of Columbia line up behind this argument. [read post]
22 May 2012, 1:54 pm
Smith, believed to be one of only two Canadians on death row in the United States, received a recommendation of no clemency from the Montana Parole Board on Monday. [read post]
20 May 2012, 8:12 pm
AP: “Twenty-two states and the District of Columbia are backing Montana in its fight to prevent the U.S. [read post]
17 May 2012, 9:01 pm
District Court Judge Charles Lovell today ruled in favor of ATP in a motion for summary judgment on several claims, finding that the state could not prohibit corporate contributions to groups engaging in independent political speech, require ATP to include certain disclaimers and citations on their communications, or prohibit political speech about candidate voting records the state judged ‘false. [read post]
15 May 2012, 9:14 am
As discussed here, the long process of litigation in the District Court and the Appellate Court meant that those who invested in Qwest waited ten years to see any recovery (even though Mr. [read post]
8 May 2012, 11:46 am
The Ninth Circuit Court, where Nguyen was appointed, has jurisdiction over the federal district courts in Hawaii, Alaska, Arizona, California, Idaho, Montana, Nevada, Oregon, Washington, Guam and the Northern Mariana Islands. [read post]
5 May 2012, 6:37 am
District Court for the Southern District of West Virginia. [read post]
26 Apr 2012, 2:45 am
KL Gates has a fine post in its Electronic Discovery Law Blog about a recent case, United Factory Furniture Corp. v. [read post]
20 Apr 2012, 3:30 am
Supreme Court took up the case of United States v. [read post]
16 Apr 2012, 6:41 am
Requires Missouri courts to interpret the United States Constitution based on its language and the intent of the signers at the time of its passage. [read post]
13 Apr 2012, 12:25 pm
*The Ninth Circuit hears appeals from federal district courts in the states of Alaska, Arizona, California, Hawaii, Idaho, Montana, Nevada, Oregon and Washington, and the territories of Guam and the Northern Mariana Islands. [read post]
12 Apr 2012, 3:21 pm
The Ninth Circuit's decision only applies to states located within the jurisdiction of that Court (Alaska, Arizona, California, Hawaii, Idaho, Montana, Nevada, Oregon and Washington). [read post]
23 Mar 2012, 7:31 am
Carrie Johnson of NPR reports that the Court’s opinion in United States v Jones (the GPS tracking case) “set off alarm bells inside the FBI, where officials are trying to figure out whether they need to change the way they do business. [read post]
15 Mar 2012, 11:25 am
The United States District Court for the District of Montana struck down the 2009 Rule as violating the ESA because the ESA does not permit partial delisting of a distinct population segment. [read post]
14 Mar 2012, 1:32 pm
Appealed from the United States District Court for the District of Montana. [read post]
