Search for: "United States v. Classic" Results 501 - 520 of 1,749
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
14 Nov 2018, 12:15 pm by Kevin
United States v. 1855.6 Pounds of American Paddlefish Meat and 982.34 Pounds of American Paddlefish Caviar (hereinafter, United States v. [read post]
31 Oct 2018, 11:21 am by John Elwood
The FCC proposes a split-the-difference alternative that is a classic Office of the Solicitor General move: Vacate the judgment and send it back to the D.C. [read post]
31 Oct 2018, 10:35 am by Daniel Nazer
”) Its litigation had all the hallmarks of classic patent trolling. [read post]
30 Oct 2018, 6:00 am by Guest Blogger
In the United States, suicide rates rose by 25% in the past two decades reaching 45,000 deaths per year. [read post]
11 Oct 2018, 2:30 pm by Dale Carpenter
Thus, in the classic case of James v Eastleigh Borough Council [1990] 2 AC 751, the criterion used for allowing free entry to the council's swimming pool was not sex but statutory retirement age. [read post]
10 Oct 2018, 2:30 pm by Dale Carpenter
Thus, in the classic case of James v Eastleigh Borough Council [1990] 2 AC 751, the criterion used for allowing free entry to the council's swimming pool was not sex but statutory retirement age. [read post]
23 Sep 2018, 4:03 pm by Schachtman
Although some causal claims may be supported by strong evidence of a biological process with mechanistic evidence, such claims are not common in United States tort litigation. [read post]
13 Sep 2018, 12:15 pm by Alan Z. Rozenshtein
But why do such figures, whether in the United States or other democracies, rarely get close to the highest levels of power? [read post]
4 Sep 2018, 3:35 pm by Kevin LaCroix
Supreme Court issued its unanimous decision in Cyan, Inc. v. [read post]
29 Aug 2018, 7:31 am by Doorey
In the United States, the termination of the plaintiff in circumstances such as this would almost certainly be a violation of Section 7 of the NLRA. [read post]
15 Aug 2018, 8:00 am by Ben
Fox Searchlight Pictures, Inc. et al, case number 2:18-cv-01435, filed in the United States District Court Central District of California, claimed the two works were "in many ways identical". [read post]