Search for: "United States v. Haire" Results 501 - 520 of 750
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
10 Apr 2023, 7:38 am by Eugene Volokh
Centro Espírita Beneficente União do Vegetal in the United States, UDV USA, https://‌udvusa.org/ [https://‌perma.cc/‌8GS5-PW2W] (last visited Feb. 14, 2023). [6]. 573 U.S. 682 (2014). [7]. 574 U.S. 352 (2015). [8]. [read post]
19 Jan 2015, 6:28 pm
It had its legal beginning in 1896, when the Supreme Court rendered a decision known as the Plessy v. [read post]
31 Mar 2017, 4:38 am by Edith Roberts
” At Think Progress, Ian Milheiser comments on Expressions Hair Design v. [read post]
20 Feb 2013, 5:00 pm by Richard Goldfarb
  The Washington Supreme Court's decision in Bylsma v. [read post]
5 Dec 2017, 12:30 pm
The United States Supreme Court just finished hearing arguments in what will likely be a landmark case about the viability of the nation’s civil rights laws. [read post]
15 Jul 2013, 2:38 pm by Jim Gerl
Some states of the United States have implemented laws to address school bullying. [read post]
6 Feb 2017, 9:41 am by Dennis Crouch
The AIA, Its Preclusion Statutes, and Cuozzo’s Path to the Supreme Court The 2011 America Invents Act (AIA) created new patent reviews within the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO): inter partes review (IPR), post-grant review (PGR), and covered business method review (CBM). [read post]
30 Aug 2017, 4:13 am by Hon. Richard G. Kopf
Kopf Senior United States District Judge (Nebraska) [i] Now, it is located at the Supreme Court, 1 First Street, Northeast, Washington, D.C. [read post]
5 Nov 2014, 9:27 am by Wells Bennett
Klayman tells the panel that he doesn’t trust the United States’ explanation for his clie [read post]
1 Apr 2011, 7:40 am
One -- at the crack of dawn on Monday morning -- is a chance to share a breakfast with the early-rising Head of the United States Patent and Trademark Office, David Kappos (details here). [read post]
2 Nov 2014, 4:06 pm by INFORRM
United States The Boston Herald has dropped its appeal and agreed to pay US$903,000 to end a libel case arising out of a 2009 story alleging that Joanna Marinova had enaged in sexual acts with a “killer con” Research and Resources “Privacy, Democracy and Freedom of Expression”, Annabelle Lever, University of Geneva, SSRN Next week in the courts We are only aware of one application this week, in the case of Prince Alwaleed v Forbes Magazine on 5… [read post]