Search for: "United States v. Hamilton" Results 501 - 520 of 1,207
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
26 Apr 2017, 9:01 pm by Marci A. Hamilton
For example, in many law schools, the sky was falling when United States v. [read post]
17 Apr 2017, 9:02 am by Matthew L.M. Fletcher
Hamilton Defending the Cobell Buy-Back Program – Rebekah Martin Intellectual Property Rights and Informed Consent in American Indian Communities: Legal and Ethical Issues– Naomi Palosaari Raising Capital in Indian Country – Evan WayNote Christman v. [read post]
16 Apr 2017, 6:00 am by Guest Blogger
Calvin Johnson For the Symposium on Michael Klarman, The Framers' Coup: The Making of the United States Constitution.Michael Klarman’s The Framers’ Coup: The Making of the United States Constitution (Oxford 2016) is an opponent’s history of the adoption of the American Constitution. [read post]
9 Apr 2017, 4:33 pm by INFORRM
Canada Graeme Hamilton in the National Post has examined how a now defunct Romanian website, globe24h.com, has shown tensions between privacy and transparency in Canadian courts. [read post]
26 Mar 2017, 5:30 am by Peter Margulies
In a speech on the eve of the 1940 election addressing the United States’ defense capabilities as World War II engulfed Europe, Roosevelt pledged, “Your boys are not going to be sent into any foreign wars. [read post]
7 Mar 2017, 11:49 am by petrocohen
  Almost 150,000 judges and lawyers across the United States have participated in the American Inns of Court program. [read post]
3 Mar 2017, 9:30 am by Benjamin Wittes, Quinta Jurecic
” And finally, on January 20, 2017, in apparent accordance with Article II, Section I, Clause 8, “Before he enter[ed] on the execution of his office, he [took] the following oath or affirmation:—‘I do solemnly swear . . . that I will faithfully execute the office of President of the United States, and will to the best of my ability, preserve, protect and defend the Constitution of the United States. [read post]
19 Feb 2017, 4:02 pm by INFORRM
Facebook has said that a legal challenge against the way it transfers EU user data to the United States was “deeply flawed” and should not be referred to the EU’s top court because ample privacy protections were already in place. [read post]
29 Jan 2017, 4:08 pm by INFORRM
Peter Odili, at the state High Court, Port Harcourt. [read post]
16 Jan 2017, 12:39 am
Webster also noted that Timothy Pickering, then secretary of state, “sent to me for the original paper, and had the letter in the original with a translation, if I mistake not, published in the Gazette of the United States”. [read post]
9 Jan 2017, 8:14 am by Peter Spiro
“It would be made upon the government of the United States. [read post]