Search for: "United States v. Little" Results 501 - 520 of 11,947
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
9 Aug 2023, 10:26 am by Kevin LaCroix
Indeed, in McDonald’s II, the court reached back before Caremark to the 1963 Delaware Supreme Court decision in Graham v. [read post]
9 Aug 2023, 7:07 am by DONALD SCARINCI
In 2012, Groff took a mail delivery job with the United States Postal Service. [read post]
9 Aug 2023, 4:18 am by Eric Segall
United States, in which the Could upheld the forced relocation of all people of Japanese descent on the West Coast just because of their ancestry. [read post]
6 Aug 2023, 10:00 pm by Merpel McKitten
Ms Martin-Pratt is currently the Deputy Director General of Directorate Trade and previously served as the Head of Copyright Unit of the Commission’s Communications, Networks, Content and Technology DG, among other, earlier illustrious posts. [read post]
5 Aug 2023, 7:00 am by jonathanturley
The implications of the filing were captured on CNN, where host Kaitlan Collins explained that “the First Amendment does not allow the President of the United States to go and claim there was fraud when he was told there was not fraud…” That is, of course, entirely wrong. [read post]
3 Aug 2023, 4:49 am by Ralf Michaels
This is not unproblematic: the European Union undertakes here the same unilateralism that it used to criticize when previously done by the United States, with the Helms/Burton Act as the most prominent example. [read post]
31 Jul 2023, 4:47 pm by INFORRM
On the other hand, the Colorado restriction might not survive the application of United States v United Foods, Inc 533 US 405 (2001), where obligations upon fresh mushroom handlers pay assessments used primarily to fund advertisements promoting mushroom sales did not survive Central Hudson scrutiny as mediated through Glickman v Wileman Brothers & Elliott, Inc 521 US 457 (1997). [read post]
30 Jul 2023, 6:25 am by Anastasiia Kyrylenko
The court rules that patent law is lex specialis.Not being an expert on Indian conflicts of law and jurisdiction/competence matters, I would not delve in the correctness of this decision (but the IPKat’s much learned readers are invited to illustrate me in the comments).Yet, the practical consequences of addressing it as conflict of competences matter, differ substantially than those of affirming that sections 3 and 4 of the Competition Act are not applicable to the cases linked to the… [read post]
28 Jul 2023, 12:28 pm by Ilya Somin
Second, immigrants and their descendants have been essential in reducing the scope of affirmative action in the United States over the last 30 years…. [read post]
27 Jul 2023, 11:42 pm by Kevin
See, e.g., “United States v. 1855.6 Pounds of American Paddlefish Meat” (Nov. 14, 2018), and the sequel, “Update: The Paddlefish Defendants Are Now for Sale (Jan. 28, 2019). [read post]
27 Jul 2023, 10:48 pm by Riann Winget
Krishnamurthi and Salib asserted that Students for Fair Admissions will have little practical effect because of cases such as McCleskey v. [read post]