Search for: "United States v. Lynch" Results 501 - 520 of 850
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
4 Jun 2014, 3:07 pm by Rick St. Hilaire
Gordon to as much incarceration as defendants in other ivory smuggling cases, including relatedcases.AUSA LaVerne disagreed with these arguments, expressing in the prosecution's memorandum,An appropriate sentence must reflect, in particular, (i) the seriousness of this offense, which is increasingly the focus of national and global law enforcement and policy efforts; (ii) the importance of general deterrence, which courts have recognized has special relevance in this context; (iii) the… [read post]
11 Apr 2014, 4:55 am by SHG
Then, below the critical quote from Lynch, is a paragraph that might help to explain the problem: Cops kicked in the door of a second-story unit that housed a family with no relation to Wiggins or his relatives, court papers state. [read post]
4 Apr 2014, 8:12 am by John Mikhail
Unless it is treated as surplusage, this second clause indicates that the Constitution vests powers in the Government of the United States that are not merely identical or coextensive with the powers vested in Congress or other Departments or Officers of the United States. [read post]
6 Mar 2014, 10:03 am by John Stigi
The Court’s decision in Chadbourne would appear to limit SLUSA to cases where plaintiffs allegedly purchased, sold or held (see Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith, Inc. v. [read post]
17 Feb 2014, 5:00 am by Trevor Cutaiar
  The United States Supreme Court has eased this tension in some cases by crafting the single claimant exception. [read post]
23 Jan 2014, 10:39 am
RobbinsCase number: 13-cv-06694 (United States District Court for the Southern District of New York)Case filed: September 23, 2013Qualifying Judgment/Order: November 27, 2013 01/17/2014 04/17/2014 2013-125 SEC v. [read post]
23 Jan 2014, 10:39 am by Mary Jane Wilmoth
RobbinsCase number: 13-cv-06694 (United States District Court for the Southern District of New York)Case filed: September 23, 2013Qualifying Judgment/Order: November 27, 2013 01/17/2014 04/17/2014 2013-125 SEC v. [read post]
21 Jan 2014, 3:30 am by David Markus
“Only the Supreme Court can finally resolve these issues, and I hope it will,” she wrote.In urging the Supreme Court to hear the case, United States v. [read post]
15 Jan 2014, 6:21 am by Adam Weinstein
On October 4, 2012, Anglin pleaded guilty to one count of mail fraud before the United States District Court for the Central District of California in U.S. v. [read post]
10 Dec 2013, 7:47 pm by Seyfarth Shaw LLP
United States, 431 U.S. 324 (1977), for the notion that individual class members (after a stage I liability finding) are entitled to a presumption that that were discriminated and their individual damages can be heard in mini-trials per Teamsters. [read post]
5 Dec 2013, 12:49 pm by Sheldon Toplitt
 (Photo credit: Wikipedia)The United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit this week in Herb Reed Enterprises LLC v. [read post]
2 Dec 2013, 3:40 am
The United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia recently addressed this issue in Kolakowski v. [read post]
2 Dec 2013, 1:16 am by Kevin LaCroix
United States (here), the Supreme Court recognized a presumption of reliance on an omission of material fact by a party with a duty to disclosure that information. [read post]