Search for: "United States v. Mississippi"
Results 501 - 520
of 1,414
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
12 Dec 2018, 9:06 pm
States with newly reported illnesses include: Michigan, Mississippi, and West Virginia. [read post]
19 Mar 2019, 4:03 am
United States, ex rel. [read post]
6 Jan 2010, 5:51 am
Hereford v. [read post]
3 Nov 2020, 6:30 am
United States (Ariella Banin & Micaela Lucero, Cornell Legal Information Institute) We rely on our readers to send us links for our round-up. [read post]
27 Aug 2020, 1:40 pm
Mississippi Valley Gas Co., 181 F. [read post]
30 Jan 2007, 3:28 am
United States, 581 F.2d 390, 397 (4th Cir. 1978). [read post]
5 Nov 2018, 11:11 am
Mississippi the court will answer the question of “[w]hether the Mississippi Supreme Court erred in how it applied Batson v. [read post]
26 Sep 2024, 9:01 pm
For those who haven’t looked at that Amendment recently, its words provide, quite straightforwardly, that, for citizens of the United States who are at least eighteen, the right to vote “shall not be denied or abridged by the United States or any state on account of age” (emphasis added).Indiana, Louisiana, Mississippi, South Carolina, and Texas grant absentee-voting eligibility specifically for all voters sixty-five or older,… [read post]
31 Dec 2013, 8:38 am
Simply put, Section 5 stated that if any jurisdiction wanted to make changes to laws relevant to voting, it first must have that aspiration upheld by the authority of the Attorney General of the United States or a three judge panel of the U.S. [read post]
27 Apr 2018, 6:47 am
United States, 16-8997, United States v. [read post]
30 Oct 2017, 3:41 am
Bryant, an equal-protection challenge by a Mississippi municipal judge to the state’s inclusion of the emblem in its official flag, comes from Linley Sanders at Newsweek. [read post]
20 Dec 2013, 6:17 am
” United States v. [read post]
1 Jul 2014, 8:18 am
United States, and Morris v. [read post]
28 Jun 2013, 12:57 pm
The United States Supreme Court ruled this Wednesday that section 3 of DOMA violates the Constitution. [read post]
18 Nov 2020, 7:09 am
In Sanchez v. [read post]
1 Feb 2018, 11:45 am
First, it only applies to “any person within the United States,” so spoofed calls initiated outside the United States are not covered. [read post]
2 Dec 2009, 10:03 am
The case is Ford v. [read post]
2 May 2011, 6:00 am
On October 16, 2007, the State requested that the charges . . . be dismissed without prejudice until its cybercrime unit could analyze the machines. [read post]
28 Oct 2018, 6:07 pm
Tyler et al – United States District Court – Northern District of Mississippi – October 22nd, 2018) involves an incident that occurred at a casino in Tunica Resorts, Mississippi. [read post]
29 Nov 2021, 3:59 pm
Anthony List hope the court will do precisely what Mississippi and a dozen other states request. [read post]
