Search for: "United States v. Parker" Results 501 - 520 of 780
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
11 Nov 2020, 9:39 am by Robert Liles
   Under Section 3729 of the civil False Claims Act, a person or entity may be in violation of the statute if the individual or entity: “(1) Knowingly presents or causes to be presented, to an officer or employee of the United States Government or a member of the Armed Forces of the United States a false or fraudulent claim for payment or approval;  (2) Knowingly makes, uses or causes to be made or used, a false record or statement to get a… [read post]
27 Jan 2024, 7:54 pm by Josh Blackman
[This post is co-authored with Professor Seth Barrett Tillman] On January 18, Professor Akhil Reed Amar and Professor Vikram Amar filed an amicus brief in Trump v. [read post]
Banks also recently wrote an essay for Stanford Lawyer about the unanimous decision, which held that state-mandated segregation of public schools violated the 14th amendment of the United States Constitution. [read post]
26 Jun 2009, 2:21 am
Justice White explained how all this works with a special focus on the role of defense counsel in a concurring and dissenting opinion in United States v. [read post]
29 Oct 2015, 5:30 pm by INFORRM
In dismissing the application in DHR International, Inc a company incorporated in Delaware in the United States of America v Challis [2015] NSWSC 1567, White J found that the plaintiff failed to show that the statements in the blog were false, ‘or at least materially false’ – a key element of the tort of injurious falsehood. [read post]
1 Jun 2011, 5:47 pm by jak4
To the more contemporary antitrust matter: Conclusions of Law and Order: United States of America v. [read post]
10 Oct 2022, 5:01 am by Robert Liles
Simply stated, Civil Investigative Demands used in False Claims Act investigations are essentially subpoenas authorized under 31 U.S. [read post]
4 Jan 2012, 12:37 pm by Steve Statsinger
Several Interesting per curiams rounded out 2011:In United States v. [read post]
3 Apr 2020, 12:58 pm by NCC Staff
Banks look at some of the history of martial law in the United States and say that, while unlikely, it is not impossible that a president facing the situation we now find ourselves in would declare martial law—but it would be wrong to do so. [read post]
9 May 2024, 7:29 am by Charlie Jarrett
Federal Trade Commission, 3:24-cv-986, United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas, filed April 23, 2024; Chamber of Commerce for the United States of America et al. v. [read post]