Search for: "Unknown Persons or Claimants"
Results 501 - 520
of 562
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
21 Oct 2010, 3:08 pm
As Eady J said in X & Y v Persons Unknown[2006] EWHC 2783 (QB), [2007] EMLR 290 at para 72: “…the Spycatcher doctrine [Attorney-General v Newspaper Publishing Plc [1988] Ch 333 at 375, 380] would go on inhibiting third parties from publishing the relevant information notionally pending a trial which would never actually take place. [read post]
20 Oct 2010, 1:50 pm
There is much that is known and unknown about mesothelioma causation. [read post]
14 Oct 2010, 5:52 pm
Persons Unknown [2010] EMLR 16. [read post]
8 Oct 2010, 4:18 am
In this case (unlike the decision in Terry v Persons Unknown), the claimant denied the allegations of an extra-marital affair and further filed evidence that the Defendant was seeking to blackmail him. [read post]
27 Sep 2010, 8:05 pm
The information in the article fell into three categories: a. the fact that an allegation had been made by an unidentified person to the Met; b. the fact that the allegation was being investigated; and c. which gave credence to the allegation: which suggested that “there was something in it” – the inculpatory information. [read post]
23 Sep 2010, 9:21 am
All I can say for sure is that SIPC’s answers say it disallowed 8,489 claims of “claimants who had no account at Madoff,” and an additional 2,094 claims (or a total of 10,583) are tentatively in this category, but conceivably could be recategorized. [read post]
22 Sep 2010, 6:26 pm
Footnote: the John Terry injunction: In a previous post I mentioned that the terms of the judgment in the now notorious case of Terry v Persons unknown indicated that the interim Injunction was not a so-called superinjunction. [read post]
16 Sep 2010, 3:02 pm
The claimant was suspicious and contacted our law office. [read post]
14 Sep 2010, 2:20 am
In his 2010 judgment in Terry (formerly LNS) v Persons Unknown ([2010] EWHC 119 (QB), [2010] EMLR 16) Mr Justice Tugendhat dismissed a claim for a super-injunction by the then England football captain John Terry, taking the opportunity to conduct a wide ranging survey of the relevant law and to criticise the approach of the claimant’s lawyers. [read post]
6 Sep 2010, 8:56 am
The Plaintiff then sued ICBC under section 24 of the Insurance (Vehicle) Act seeking compensation for his personal injuries. [read post]
19 Aug 2010, 12:23 am
This year's line up includes the Dave Matthews Band, Keane, Phoenix, and the AmeriKat's personal favorite - My Morning Jacket. [read post]
5 Aug 2010, 2:08 pm
First, the Act, with its “predominantly regulatory scheme,” evinces Congress’ preference for administrative rather than jury resolution of vaccine claims because juries tend to discount overall societal utility of a product when confronted with an injured person. [read post]
29 Jul 2010, 9:48 pm
"22 The Act was not intended to apply to errors and omissions coverage written on a "claims made" basis for persons such as design professionals.The first part also addresses an insurer’s duty to defend a construction professional against a property owner’s notice of claim served under CDARA. [read post]
19 Jul 2010, 1:38 am
For rather unknown persons, it does not introduce any additional burden, because their reputation will usually only be affected in their home country anyway. [read post]
14 Jul 2010, 10:32 am
In the recent case of Terry (previously ‘LNS’) v Persons Unknown ([2010] EWHC 119 (QB)) the court addressed the inter-relationship between two principles: the principle that the court may grant an interim injunction to restrain a threatened misuse of private information where the claimant can show that his claim is (at least) more likely than not to succeed, and the rule in Bonnard v Perryman ([1891] 2 Ch 269 (CA)) whereby the court almost invariably will not… [read post]
13 Jul 2010, 7:28 am
They approached the claimant and other persons concerned with the allegations which caused an investigation to commence. [read post]
11 Jul 2010, 8:28 am
Title reserveration clauses, however, must be carefully dinstinguished from situations where the claimant is the owner of the asset in question by virtue of a fiduciary transfer of ownership for security purposes. [read post]
25 Jun 2010, 4:55 am
The claimant would of course prefer that the injury had never taken place. [read post]
23 Jun 2010, 1:30 am
This means that when a person’s reputation is damaged by publications by private persons, including the media, the Courts must balance the Article 8 rights of the person whose reputation is in issue against the Article 10 rights of the publishers. [read post]
22 Jun 2010, 2:55 am
This was an application for an injunction against persons unknown restraining dissemination and publication of the detail and fact of an alleged extra marital affair. [read post]
