Search for: "Wagner v. Wagner" Results 501 - 520 of 1,129
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
9 Mar 2012, 1:49 pm by Keith A. Davidson
Judge Noonan, writing for the United States Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals, just clarified an issue on hearsay, the so-called state of mind exception, in a case titled Wagner v. [read post]
1 Aug 2011, 8:23 am by Graeme Hall
X & Y v UK settled without hearing, Nearlylegal. [read post]
25 Feb 2010, 3:15 am
”The Court of Appeals cited Gavigan v McCoy, 37 NY2d 548, Niebling v Wagner, 12 NY2d 314, and Mandle v Brown, 4 AD2d 283, affirmed 5 NY2d 51, as cases demonstrating the proposition that an employee cannot achieve a higher grade or salary by being assigned or engaging in out-of-title work “because this would violate the fundamental civil service tenet of advancement through competitive examination. [read post]
16 Jul 2021, 4:12 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
Contrary to the holding in Blum v Perlstein (47 AD3d 741 [2d Dept 2008]) which cited to this Court’s decisions in Berkowitz v Fischbein, Badillo, Wagner & Harding (7 AD3d 385 [1st Dept 2004]) and Argyle Capital Mgt. [read post]
28 Jun 2024, 4:06 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
The elements of the malpractice claim were adequately pleaded at this stage of the proceedings (see Jarmuth v Wagner, 219 AD3d 1248 [1st Dept 2023]). [read post]
12 Oct 2010, 4:17 am by INFORRM
  In this post the energetic Adam Wagner ties together themes from two recent posts on Inforrm and adds some interesting points. [read post]
1 Jul 2012, 2:43 pm by Walter Olson
A view from Left: conservatives lost Thursday, and purported silver lining’s not even tin [Lemieux] NFIB v. [read post]
25 Jul 2011, 1:07 am by Melina Padron
See also Adam Wagner’s review of recent developments in terrorism law. [read post]
14 Dec 2018, 2:56 pm by Heather Donkers
Heather’s Legal Summaries: The case of R v Boudreault, 2018 SCC 58Victim Fine Surcharges Today, the Supreme Court of Canada released its decision in four cases, heard together as R v Boudreault, 2018 SCC 58. [read post]
25 Feb 2009, 4:30 am
"The Court of Appeals cited Gavigan v McCoy, 37 NY2d 548, Niebling v Wagner, 12 NY2d 314, and Mandle v Brown, 4 AD2d 283, affirmed 5 NY2d 51, as cases demonstrating the proposition that an employee cannot achieve a higher grade or salary by being assigned or engaging in out-of-title work "because this would violate the fundamental civil service tenet of advancement through competitive examination. [read post]