Search for: "Waits v State"
Results 501 - 520
of 12,153
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
27 Sep 2023, 7:19 am
Unique lawsuits like Alienation of Affection and Criminal Conversation are still a part of the state’s legal fabric, as the Hull v. [read post]
25 Sep 2023, 7:47 am
& Exchange Comm'n v. [read post]
25 Sep 2023, 5:00 am
ATTORNEY FAILED TO EXPLAIN AWAY YEAR-LONG DELAYAfter HGL was injured in a motorcycle accident, he filed suit against TMM and other defendants in the Queens County Supreme Court.When the latter moved to dismiss the litigation, claiming that HGL’s injuries weren’t “serious,” as defined by the state’s Insurance Law, HGL failed to oppose the motion.About a year later, after HGL moved to vacate his default, and the Supreme Court denied that request, an appeal… [read post]
23 Sep 2023, 2:08 pm
That was our experience as appellate military defense counsel in United States v. [read post]
23 Sep 2023, 3:43 am
It is also questionable whether the Court was correct in stating that consumer perception will only be relevant in certain circumstances, when the CJEU stated at least twice in Louboutin (at least in the English translation – see paras 43 and 48) that it was ‘necessary’, in order to determine whether a marketplace operator makes ‘use’ of a sign, to assess consumer perception. [read post]
21 Sep 2023, 2:57 pm
If signed by the Governor, this legislation would codify the 2008 California Supreme Court decision in Edwards v. [read post]
20 Sep 2023, 7:47 am
[1] Garcoa, Inc. v. [read post]
20 Sep 2023, 6:24 am
’ The case is Jones v. [read post]
16 Sep 2023, 6:44 am
Hamaday v. [read post]
14 Sep 2023, 6:00 am
Part 1 of this piece can be found here. [read post]
13 Sep 2023, 1:46 pm
COMINT Systems Corp. v. [read post]
13 Sep 2023, 6:00 am
In 1972, the per se flood crested in U.S. v. [read post]
11 Sep 2023, 9:01 pm
As the Supreme Court stated in the 1868 case of Texas v. [read post]
11 Sep 2023, 10:00 am
One such example is that of Bennett v. [read post]
10 Sep 2023, 9:03 am
Burke V. [read post]
10 Sep 2023, 3:00 am
I did not have to wait for the opinion to tell me what any rookie lawyer should have known. [read post]
10 Sep 2023, 12:08 am
: on Green v The Lichfield Diocesan Board of Finance [2023] UKET 2409635/2022, which we noted here. [read post]
8 Sep 2023, 5:31 pm
See Navrides v. [read post]
8 Sep 2023, 9:48 am
Rafael Carranza, Arizona Republic, Sept. 8, 2023 "The U.S. government has reached a class-action settlement to speed up the asylum process for nearly 20,000 Afghans evacuated to the United States two years ago and who have been waiting for months for their applications to be adjudicated. [read post]
6 Sep 2023, 5:51 pm
(People v. [read post]