Search for: "Williams v. New York"
Results 501 - 520
of 3,495
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
3 Aug 2022, 2:00 am
*This is the eleventh post in a symposium on William Novak’s New Democracy: The Creation of the Modern American State. [read post]
26 Feb 2015, 6:30 am
New York: Abrams Books for Young Readers, 2014. [read post]
20 Apr 2016, 2:04 pm
Other early coverage comes from Sam Hananel of Associated Press, Robert Barnes of The Washington Post, Richard Wolf of USA Today, Josh Gerstein of Politico, Pete Williams of NBC News, Howard Fischer of Arizona Daily Sun, and Adam Liptak of The New York Times. [read post]
13 Nov 2015, 2:35 pm
This afternoon the Court granted review in Whole Woman’s Health v. [read post]
29 Mar 2016, 11:06 am
But earlier this month Judge William H. [read post]
16 Apr 2012, 6:20 am
District Judge William Pauley. [read post]
24 Sep 2008, 3:40 pm
Collins, Chief Justice William H. [read post]
17 Sep 2010, 10:32 am
New York (1968), and argues that the California statutory standard is unconstitutionally vague. [read post]
17 Sep 2020, 4:00 am
Matter of Fishman, 22 A.D.3d 100, 2005 NYSlipOp 06802 Matter of Calonge v Calonge, 52 AD3d 1111, 2008 NYSlipOp 05630; Matter of Marino, 73 A.D.3d 5, 2010 NYSlipOp 01800; Matter of McKenzie, 177 AD3d 134, 2019 NYSlipOp 06729; People v Jenkins, 55 Misc 3d 1207(A), 2017 NYSlipOp 50449(U); and People v Williams, 20 AD3d 72, 2005 NYSlipOp 04317. ** Respondent stipulated that [1] he stands convicted of a… [read post]
17 Sep 2020, 4:00 am
Matter of Fishman, 22 A.D.3d 100, 2005 NYSlipOp 06802 Matter of Calonge v Calonge, 52 AD3d 1111, 2008 NYSlipOp 05630; Matter of Marino, 73 A.D.3d 5, 2010 NYSlipOp 01800; Matter of McKenzie, 177 AD3d 134, 2019 NYSlipOp 06729; People v Jenkins, 55 Misc 3d 1207(A), 2017 NYSlipOp 50449(U); and People v Williams, 20 AD3d 72, 2005 NYSlipOp 04317. ** Respondent stipulated that [1] he stands convicted of a… [read post]
Extrinsic evidence of the intent of the parties of no moment in interpreting the terms of a contract
10 Nov 2008, 12:15 pm
Extrinsic evidence of the intent of the parties of no moment in interpreting the terms of a contractKito v Board of Educ. of William Floyd School Dist., 2008 NY Slip Op 08459, Decided on November 5, 2008, Appellate Division, Second DepartmentBernard J. [read post]
25 Nov 2015, 4:00 am
OATH Administrative Law Judge denies employer’s motion to strike the testimony of two witnesses called by the accused NYC Department of Corrections v Williams, OATH Index No. 2223/15In this hearing conducted pursuant to Civil Service Law §75, OATH Administrative Law Judge John B. [read post]
30 Apr 2014, 5:35 am
Other coverage comes from NPR’s Nina Totenberg, Pete Williams of NBC News, Adam Liptak of The New York Times, and Jaclyn Belczyk of JURIST, while Bill Blum comments on the cases at truthdig. [read post]
18 Aug 2009, 12:32 pm
In a 1993 decision, Herrera v. [read post]
30 Oct 2015, 9:30 pm
Fletcher, Maggie McKinley, and Joseph William Singer have filed an amicus brief in Dollar General v. [read post]
25 Jun 2015, 3:36 pm
This morning the Court announced its decision in King v. [read post]
20 Jan 2012, 10:17 am
This posting was written by William Zale, Editor of CCH Advertising Law Guide.Cat litter manufacturer Clorox was preliminarily enjoined by the federal district court in New York City from airing a television commercial making comparative claims about cat litter odor reduction.Competitor Church & Dwight (C & D) was likely to succeed on the merits of its Lanham Act false advertising suit that the commercial made literally false claims based on an unreliable… [read post]
4 Feb 2015, 5:49 am
In an op-ed for The New York Times, William Baude urges the Court to provide more information regarding the orders that it issues, arguing that, with “[t]he court . . . in the spotlight more and more, “[t]ransparency in all its decisions is vital to its continued legitimacy. [read post]
14 Oct 2019, 9:11 pm
Sagaponack Realty, LLC v. [read post]
9 Apr 2007, 1:23 am
Amerson, defendant-appellant
NEW YORK COUNTYEmploymentCourt Denies Petition to Reinstate Promotional Exam for Station Agents, Transit Cleaners Matter of Local 100 v. [read post]
