Search for: "Wood v. United States (two Cases)"
Results 501 - 520
of 747
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
4 Jan 2011, 8:36 am
Schwarzenegger in the federal United States District Court for the Northern District of California. [read post]
31 Oct 2018, 11:21 am
Just two last items about these cases that interested me. [read post]
4 Dec 2023, 3:06 pm
On January 1, 2024, Peter Pan will finally enter the public domain in the United States—but not in Barrie’s native United Kingdom. [read post]
16 Sep 2013, 6:49 am
” The circuit judges followed with a ruling two weeks ago in the securities fraud case of United States v. [read post]
16 Jul 2016, 5:07 am
The government’s cover letter explains that it is going forward with the proposal despite yesterday’s decision in the Microsoft case in the Second Circuit (discussed by Andrew Woods here), but lays down a pretty clear marker that it will be addressing that decision soon. [read post]
20 Apr 2010, 9:29 am
While not quite rising to the level of the Tiger Woods affair, the 2008 Qualcomm v. [read post]
2 Jul 2014, 7:19 am
Lynn, executive director of Americans United for Separation of Church and State, which filed a friend-of-the-court brief in the case, said, “The justices have set a dangerous precedent. [read post]
1 Apr 2011, 5:13 am
(The claimant had relied on the requirements in Huang v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2007] 2 AC 167 at [19]). [read post]
16 Jun 2016, 9:30 pm
United States, a case about whether the VA was required to comply with a provision of U.S. code known as the “Rule of Two” that requires contracting officers to award contracts to veteran-owned small businesses under certain conditions—in the Court’s opinion, Justice Clarence Thomas wrote that Congress’ use of the words “shall award contracts” conveyed a “mandatory duty” and that the Rule of Two must… [read post]
10 Nov 2007, 10:07 pm
Wood, 18 F.3d 662 (9th Cir. 1994)................................................................36 Cooey v. [read post]
12 Oct 2015, 1:21 am
On 8 October 2015 Sir Michael Tugendhat heard an appeal from the Master in the case of Bates v Leeds United FC . [read post]
16 Dec 2020, 3:00 am
The Court further dismissed two other claims not related to the takings claim and stated that because plaintiffs had three other opportunities to amend their complaint and bring viable claims and failed to do so, the Court would dismiss this case and bar further suit against defendants. [read post]
20 May 2016, 6:54 am
The two agencies investigate employee complaints for both state and federal charges. [read post]
14 Feb 2010, 7:19 pm
United States v. [read post]
13 Feb 2024, 6:30 am
He left the bulk of his estate to the United States.[2] He never explained what he expected the United States to do with the money, which was then the largest unrestricted gift ever made to the federal government.[3] “Taxes are the price we pay for civilized society,” he’d once written in a famous dissent.[4] Was the bequest a kind of tax he felt he owed the country? [read post]
17 Oct 2015, 7:21 am
Tim Edgar examined the Schrems v. [read post]
29 Apr 2011, 1:30 pm
By Daniel RichardsonState v. [read post]
13 Nov 2017, 3:58 am
” At The World and Everything in It (podcast), Mary Reichard analyzes the oral arguments in two habeas cases, Ayestas v. [read post]
18 Dec 2011, 7:17 am
Nuclear tests and conscientious objectors Last week there were news of two very interesting cases. [read post]
12 Feb 2017, 12:48 pm
For example, in Whitney v. [read post]
