Search for: "Bounds v. State" Results 5181 - 5200 of 9,960
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
5 Sep 2014, 7:27 am by Jane Chong
Here’s the introduction: In June 2014, the Supreme Court handed down its decision in Riley v. [read post]
1 Sep 2014, 12:49 am by Giles Peaker
See paragraph 13(a) of my decision in RJ v Secretary of State for Work and Pensions [2012] AACR 28. [read post]
29 Aug 2014, 11:28 am by John Bellinger
”)  The Second Circuit panel rejected the plaintiffs’ arguments that courts are not required to defer to Executive branch SoIs and that there is, or should be, a jus cogens exception to official acts immunity, holding that it was bound by the Circuit’s prior decision in Matar v. [read post]
28 Aug 2014, 9:01 pm by Vikram David Amar
SB 1272 submits the following question (designated by the California Secretary of State as Proposition 49) to the California electorate for its input: Shall the Congress of the United States propose, and the California Legislature ratify, an amendment or amendments to the United States Constitution to overturn Citizens United v. [read post]
27 Aug 2014, 7:14 am by Joy Waltemath
It also argued that the state high court had not adopted Burlington Northern & Santa Fe Railway Co. v. [read post]
25 Aug 2014, 7:54 am by Joy Waltemath
Department of Justice, or that its claims were not seeking a premature adjudication in the abstract without any actual facts and circumstances relating to the employment practices at issue (State of Texas v EEOC, August 20, 2014, Cummings, S). [read post]
22 Aug 2014, 10:26 am by Donald Thompson
 In United States v Davis, 726 F3d 357 [2nd Cir 2013], defendant was federally charged with assaulting another inmate at the Metropolitan Detention Center, which the government alleged was “within the special maritime and territorial jurisdiction of the United States,” an element of that offense. [read post]
20 Aug 2014, 7:14 pm
  Social science and policy students are taught that the special character of law is critical for better understanding policy and distinguishing the actions of states, around which law is bound, and the lesser obligations of religion, ethics, morals and governance (except to the extent those are operationalized as law through their incorporation within the domestic legal order of a state). [read post]